2003-06-20 TWOOD - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

GRAHAM:Thank you. SPRINGER:Thank you, Members. Are we, is there any further discussion or are we ready to get into the application before us? IÓd just like to get or offer clarification on the new Condition 10. IÓd like to make clear that the fence be an 8-foot chain-linked fence or of comparable security effect. GADD:Ms. Chairman, maybe we could specify the height, that might address that. SPRINGER:Eight feet? GADD:Yeah. And then that would solve that, I think. SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Gadd. Members, are we ready to hear a m KUBOTA:Madam Chair, was your verbiage to be included as a stated condition? I thought the type of fencing was to be negotiated at the time of final permitting? SPRINGER:Eight-foot chain link or of comparable security effect. KUBOTA:ThatÓs to be included, and itÓs what the Applicant is requesting? I thought the ApplicantÓs representative wanted it left up to them because they might choose -. SPRINGER:A rock wall? KUBOTA:A rock wall. SPRINGER:If it offers the comparable security effect. GRAHAM:That was my understanding, the same as Ms. Kubota, that t decision would come at the time of Plan Approval, that offers to the adjoining parcel an appropriate security fence, determined at the time of plan approval, and the height requirement. SPRINGER:Mr. Torigoe? TORIGOE:Yeah, I just, as I hear this discussion, it seems that it would be good to give the Planning Director some guidance as to the type of fence that you envision. You know, if you leave without any kind of specification then, you know, there could be disagreements between the Planning Director and the Applicant later as to how tall this fence should be or what kind of fence it should be. So, I guess, minimally, I would suggest that the height be specified. 22