Laserfiche WebLink
EMLER: Okay. <br />RHO: If no further questions and if I can ask the applicant and his <br />representative to step back, we have public testimony. We have six people, well, actually <br />five people signed up. If I can call them up now: Luna Hauanio, Dr. Ted Leaf, Jane Dulaney <br />and Shawnie Stephens. We are missing somebody. Oh, no, no, Dr. Ted Leaf. <br />QUINTO: May I on his behalf? <br />RHO: So you are representing him. Okay. So can I swear you all in, <br />all four of you, and can you raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth <br />now before the Planning Commission? <br />TESTIFIERS: Yes. <br />RHO: Okay. Then we can start on my left – I’m not sure what your <br />name is – but will you state your name and your mailing address, and then you can proceed <br />with your testimony. <br />STEPHENS: Hi, my name is Shawnie Stephens, and -, address is what you <br />are asking for? <br />RHO: Yes, your mailing address. <br />STEPHENS: Okay. It’s 77-6561 Naniloa Drive. It’s the home that’s right <br />next to the proposed road that’s going from Naniloa into this subdivision. I’m here really not <br />to be against any of this; it’s more just to be in support of what I believe is to be a big <br />concern of mine and possibly a lot of people in the community. One is that I find after <br />reading the traffic study that it really isn’t complete; they’ve completely disregarded Naniloa <br />Drive in terms of representing the effect of traffic, and in the actual study Naniloa Drive is <br />not included in this report. So I think that what I would like to see happen is that traffic <br />study done with that being included, considering that traffic is probably going to be increased <br />by about 3,200 percent coming into that area from what it is now. <br />And the other concern I have is that this is at this point the only entrance to the property. <br />I’ve been told by the developers that they are looking at making an agreement with Metzler. <br />And I would just propose to you that there would be a condition of approval that that be done <br />before any zoning requests be approved. My concern is that, you know, they hope that <br />would happen, but then they get approval, then we wouldn’t see it happen. So those are my <br />two biggest concerns. Like I said, I know development happens. And of course I would love <br />to keep my little area in Kona, and not have to deal with all the traffic and the new -, you <br />know. But I am in support of development cause I know it happens, but I’m really concerned <br />about the traffic and the safety. And I don’t think those things have been addressed. And so <br />just in ending this, I just think that the condition of this zoning should be based on an egress <br />off Alii Drive. You are concerned about the Alii Drive traffic. I can’t imagine what would <br />EXHIBIT A <br />12 <br /> <br />