Laserfiche WebLink
development. How does this development even begin to apply for this SMA Permit? Why <br />hasn’t the SHPD disapproved of this developer’s desires in maintenance of compliance with <br />State Law 6E? <br />My organization is wholeheartedly against this development for the above-cited reason and <br />for detrimental effect to present traffic conditions this development will bring. Kulana Huli <br />Honua participates in numerous community projects to help with identification of traditional <br />mauka-makai trails, and we work to collaborate with established families of this land, who <br />know this land best, to help our community grow into the future. Developments like this one <br />coming before you to get in under the gun, that is, prior to the widespread teaching to Kona’s <br />public the wealth of history our lands contain. We urge you to deny this application for the <br />detrimental effect this development will bring to the past heritage and to the present safety of <br />the lands of Kona. <br />I have not had the opportunity to look over this EIS because, if you bear with me, the lands <br />of Kona are enraged with such applications for use by developers. When I say “under the <br />gun,” I say to you that for programs that teach about Kona’s very peculiar and very special <br />history are not in place yet, or they have not begun in strength to educate the new people who <br />live on the land. How is it that the Kahaluu Historic District can begin to see this <br />application? There are comments that have been made about their plan to go green. Green <br />upon desecration? We don’t understand the Kahaluu Historic District. If you were to ask <br />people why is this land declared a national historic landmark, I bet you, the majority of them <br />would not know. I say that if it weren’t for community non-profits and other educational <br />centers, we would not even have a voice to talk about the past history. <br />I have testimony that I’ve also prepared for tonight’s presentation. But I ask you, because it <br />has pertinence to this matter here on this application, Members of the Commission, would <br />you direct me to wait till tonight or I have given you my testimony for the second matter? <br />RHO: I would, I personally would prefer that you presented it tonight, <br />to address the Plan at six. But do you have any other comments or anything else you want to <br />share with the Commission in terms of this specific application? <br />ROY: I would. There have been comments that have been made <br />about this application complies with the Kona Development Plan. Well, I say this: the Kona <br />Development Plan is not heard by the majority of people. And that’s what my testimony will <br />be tonight. And so, no, when they say it conforms to this or that, does it conform to the very <br />things that I may bring up at this time? For example, does it -, do these people add or wish to <br />help the story of this unique place live? Have they even contacted persons like myself? Our <br />organization has long been in service to this coastline. I have not met them. They have not <br />called. Why is this? My father restored Ahu‘ena Heiau. I am now kahu of this precious <br />temple, the first restored in the modern era. <br />Kulana Huli Honua has been in service for 10 years. I think this is suspect. And I say this is <br />precious kapola alaea to me and to people of Kona. I do not like to see the partitioning of <br />these lands without having adequate voice of this past, so that it is understood before they <br />EXHIBIT A <br />23 <br /> <br />