My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-20 TKONAHEIGHTS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-06-20 TKONAHEIGHTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:54:19 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:54:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
One thing to add, we have had several letters submitted; these have been passed out to the <br />Commissioners. Also including, we have a June 19, 2008, letter from the applicant’s <br />representative, which does some changes to the Change of Zone as well as the SMA <br />nd <br />conditions that kind of brings into those changes that we had spoken about at out May 22 <br />hearing. Thank you. <br />RHO: Jeff, those changes basically are only on the recommendations, <br />right? I mean the conditions -? <br />DARROW: Correct. On the conditions -. <br />RHO: For both the Change of Zone and the SMA, yes? And then <br />there is, the last couple of pages, which references the Kona Development Plan. Right? <br />Okay. Any questions for staff? Yes, Commissioner Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman. Jeff, what are they doing as far as the <br />affordable housing requirements? <br />DARROW: In the application the applicant is proposing to conduct the <br />affordable housing requirements on the property just mauka of this particular application. <br />They are allowed to do it offsite; it doesn’t necessarily have to be on site. So they are <br />proposing to do these requirements in the future project that’s just mauka identified in this <br />particular area here. And if we could have the applicant go into greater detail as to how they <br />are going to achieve that requirement; but that’s my understanding through the application. <br />RHO: Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Would it be appropriate to ask -, maybe have the Public Works <br />Department come up; but I’d like to know the status of the Parkway now and in the future. <br />RHO: Okay, I see Mr. Emler in the audience. If you can come up. <br />EMLER: Thank you, Commissioner Domingo. The question is what is <br />the latest status on the Kahaluu to Keauhou Parkway project. To my understanding, the <br />latest is there’s going to have to be some more data recovery done on the project, which is <br />being planned or in the process. I checked the State transportation improvement list and it’s <br />on the schedule for 2011, as far as the funding is concerned right now. But these lists are <br />continually revised; so it could be moved up if the project were made ready. So it’s <br />possibility. I don’t want to say that’s, you know, cast in stone. <br />DOMINGO: Thank you. <br />RHO: Thank you. Any other questions? If I can now have the <br />applicants or the applicant’s representatives come up. Can I swear both of you in again. Do <br />you swear or affirm to tell the truth now before the Planning Commission? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.