My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-06-30 TPALAMANUI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-06-30 TPALAMANUI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 7:56:07 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 7:56:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
use community; thereÓre going to be a mix of commercial and housing programs going on here <br />and higher education. And we just, since, you know, no developer wants to come and ask for <br />changes, but since we have to ask for some changes, we are askin <br />well. WeÓll be happy to answer any questions, and thank you. <br />WATANABE: Does that pretty much conclude your presentation then? And youÓll be <br />open to questions now? <br /> <br />OKAMOTO: Yes, sir. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Okay, thank you. Well, fellow Commissioners, do we have any questions <br />of the applicant or the representatives? <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Mr. Chair? <br /> <br />WATANABE: Mr. Housel. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Yes. Just to clarify, we are talking about two issues here, or two requests: <br />one to rezone the part of the Business Park, and the second weÓve talked about the roads and <br />everything concerning with the university. In your documentatio <br />of acres in the Project District, and I just want to clarify that youÓre removing the 29 acres that <br />you want to place in the mixed use area, is that correct? <br /> <br />OKAMOTO: ThatÓs correct. ItÓs not new acreage; itÓs part of the Business Park. The <br />zoning changes from Project District to MCX, but the total acreage is the same. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Right, right. Now the, I want to understand this carefully that there are in <br />the original agreement some conditions that youÓre committed to, to build roads and other things <br />in the Project District, which were contingent upon getting certificates of occupancy for other <br />areas. Does that, does this, what you are proposing, remove that business area from those <br />contingencies now; i.e. if you get, if you build buildings in the business district, do those, and <br />you get certificates of occupancy, do those, are those contingent on the Project District or <br />separate? <br /> <br />HARRIS: The overall Project District is 725 acres. The zone change down below, <br />we were allowed in the Project District 102 acres of mixed commercial. The balance was either <br />open space or public space and residential, the 1,100 residential. So the conditions that provide <br />that we need to have a road completed before certificate of occupancy, those remain in effect for <br />the whole, the whole area and -. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: The whole project. <br /> <br />HARRIS: Yes, and would apply to the MCX as well. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Okay. So if a certificate of occupancy is issued for any of the buildings <br />that you build in the Business Park, it will apply to the conditions of the overall project design, is <br />that correct? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.