HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-06-30 TMOOERS
LEEWARD PLANNING COMMISSION
COUNTY OF HAWAIÒI
HEARING TRANSCRIPT
JUNE 30, 2009
GREGORY R. MOOERS (SMA 09-32)
A regularly advertised hearing on the application of
was called to order at 2:20 p.m. in the Sheraton Keauhou Bay Resort and Spa, Keauhou
Ballroom, 78-128 ÒEhukai Street, Kailua-Kona, HawaiÒi with Chairman Rodney Watanabe
presiding.
PRESENT: Rodney Watanabe
Brandi Beaudet
Lani Bowman
Geraldine Giffin
Frederic Housel
Wayne Iokepa
Warren Lee, Public Works Director Î Ex Officio Member (left at 3:06 p.m.)
Bill Brilhante, Deputy Corporation Counsel
AIKdhsgd`cSncc+Ok`mmhmfChqdbsnq
Jeff Darrow, Staff Planner
Maija Cottle, Staff Planner
Cd`mmdAtf`cn+Ok`mmdq+Jnm`Neehbd
LdqqhbjMhrghlnsn+DmfhmddqhmfChuhrhnm+COV'kdes`s29/5o-l-(
And approximately 15 people from the public in attendance
APPLICANT: GREGORY R. MOOERS (SMA 09-32)
Special Management Area (SMA) Use Permit to allow the renovation of the King
KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel, its commercial area, and related parking and landscaping
improvements on approximately 12.89 acres in the Special Management Area. The project site
is the existing King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel complex, Kailua-Kona, North Kona,
HawaiÒi, TMK: 7-5-06:20, 21, 24 & 32; 7-5-05:62, 66 & 75.
WATANABE: Okay, the next agenda item is, the applicant is Greg Mooers and this is an
SMA, Special Management Area Permit, to allow the renovation of the King KamehamehaÓs
Kona Beach Hotel. With that, IÓll turn it over to Maija.
COTTLE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The applicant, Gregory Mooers,
a Special Management Area Use Permit to renovate the King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel,
its commercial area, and related parking and landscaping improvements on approximately 12.89
acres within the SMA.
And if I can just direct your attention up to the screen. The property is located in Kailua Village
between Kuakini Highway and the Kailua Pier. It is shown on this slide outlined in black. ItÓs
currently zoned Resort, and surrounding properties towards Kuakini Highway are zoned
EXHIBIT C
1
Commercial. Properties to the west are zoned Residential. This is an aerial photograph of the
site. And you can see the hotel, its two towers Î the east and west tower, and the other hotel
structures. ThereÓs a pool up in the front near whatÓs known as Kamakahonu Beach. ItÓs the
sandy beach in front of the hotel. You can also see the tennis courts as well as the parking area
behind the hotel. The historically significant and culturally significant sites known as AhuÒena
Heiau are shown here towards the bottom of the slide; and these sites are located on the hotel
properties as well.
The applicant is proposing to demolish the pool side and retail area. This is located between the
two hotel towers in the central arcade structure. TheyÓre also proposing to remove the existing
pool and bar area and replace it with a new pool and deck located further mauka of the beach.
And they would like to add a terrace and a service corridor and a vestibule area outside of the
conference rooms, and demolish the greenhouse and tennis courts to create additional parking
stalls. TheyÓre also proposing landscaping and hardscaping improvements, which include like
the concrete sidewalks and pathways. No work will occur makai o
walkway thatÓs currently there near the sandy beach and no work will occur near the historically
and culturally significant sites associated with the AhuÒena Hei
This is a demolition plan that the applicant has submitted. All
for demolition. So thereÓs the greenhouse up in the top left corner, the tennis courts near the
parking area and the retail shop area between the two hotel towe
then the pool will be replaced with this new pool area. Again, itÓll be located a little bit further
mauka of the shoreline. And theyÓre proposing a lagoon, as well as -. This little square here is
an addition of the vestibule area leading into the conference rooms, as well as a service corridor
behind the conference rooms, and a breakout terrace area. And, as I mentioned before, no work
will occur makai of this curved concrete walkway near the sandy beach area.
The applicant has also submitted exterior building elevations.
the hotel will look like after the renovations. And the top view would be if youÓre standing on
Palani Road where it turns into AliÒi Drive looking towards the hotel. So this little structure here
would be new. This is near the location of the conference rooms. And then the second elevation
is if you were standing in the parking lot looking towards the beach. So, again, this is the new
little pre-conference vestibule area. And then the third elevation would be if youÓre standing
near the beach or on the beach looking towards the parking lot.
So, you should have a few new items, and IÓll just go over those quickly. One is from the
Department of Environmental Management. ItÓs related to the condition for rehabilitating the
existing sewer lines. You should also have a letter of support from the Shopoff Group that you
probably received this morning, as well as a yellow sheet that has an addition to Condition 5.
GIFFIN: That was faxed to us.
COTTLE: Okay.
GIFFIN: I mean -.
COTTLE: You probably got that a while ago.
EXHIBIT C
2
GIFFIN: Yes.
COTTLE: So the reason the Planning Department is requesting this addition to
Condition 5 is because the shoreline access in this area Î actually let me go forward Î is a little
bit limited. Someone could walk from AliÒi Drive through the Kailua Pier area onto the sandy
beach in front of the hotel. But then as you start walking further away from the hotel, you come
towards the Heiau, and thereÓs also a breachin this shoreline area on the adjacent property to the
west where thereÓs a boat slip that was put in some time ago. So the County recently met with
the State DLNR, Na Ala Hele Trail Program, and the National Park Service to try to find a way
to link the shoreline trail at Kona Bay Estates, which is off the map to the left, and link that to the
AliÒi Drive area. So they came up with two preferred alignments. As you can see, one of them
comes off of the road entry into Kona Bay Estates, goes along the adjacent landownerÓs property
line towards the parking lot of the hotel and then drops down along their service road onto the
beach. And then the other alignment goes along the inlet on the adjacent property and, again,
drops down in the grassy area onto the beach. So the hotel property line is right about here.
Well, I canÓt quite do a straight line with this little thing, but itÓs in this area. So as you can see,
both alignments would require that the hotel allow the public to access their property away from
the shoreline area, outside of the shoreline area through the hotel properties. So this is why
weÓre requesting this additional condition, so that if in the future the Planning Department is able
to secure a public access easement from the adjacent landowner then the hotel will allow those
people to access the beach through their hotel property.
And, lastly, you should also have received proposed amendments to the condition submitted by
the applicantÓs representative from Carlsmith Ball. And we have another letter from Aelbert
Mahina Aehegma that you should also have received. And so with that, the Planning
Department is recommending approval of the applicantÓs request for a Special Management Area
Use Permit with the recommended conditions.
WATANABE: Okay, thank you. Maija, with regard to that potential public shoreline
access, is that like, what, 10 foot or something?
COTTLE: Yes, the standard easement is 10 feet, -.
WATANABE: Okay.
COTTLE: Access easement.
WATANABE: Fellow Commissioners, do we have any questions of staf
HOUSEL: Maija, the proposed red-lined route, does that enter the shoreline makai of
where the guard station is?
COTTLE: You mean entering the Kona Bay Estates guard station?
HOUSEL: Right, right.
EXHIBIT C
3
COTTLE: ItÓs actually just outside of that, just mauka.
HOUSEL: Okay. So it would not go through the guard station, rig
COTTLE: No.
HOUSEL: Okay. Because they do not allow people to walk in there
COTTLE: Right. So, so actually access would be, if you were walking from Kona
Bay Estates, youÓd walk along the shoreline up to the road -.
HOUSEL: Okay.
COTTLE: And then out towards the hotel properties.
HOUSEL: Okay, okay.
COTTLE: And, and I just want to add that these are preferred alignments. You
know, weÓve requested that the applicant submit a public access plan within a year and consider,
work with the County, work with National Park Service to, to come up with what alignment
would be best for all parties.
HOUSEL: Okay. To be clear about what conditions the Director is approving, we
th
just received a letter dated June 29 from Carlsmith Ball that has changes in the conditions.
Does the Director agree with those changes?
COTTLE: You want to answer that, BJ?
LEITHEAD TODD: I have no problem with the proposed changes to item, to No. 4.
I disagree with the changes to No. 5 because I think that we can
accommodation with the property owner on the parking stalls for the public; I think dropping it
down to eight is just too little. And I have to disclose that part of this is just that it -. To me itÓs
not just the beach, but itÓs also the pier that I was hoping to create some public parking for. A
I was recognizing that the beach and the pier together on weekends during canoe regatta season
has a lot of people. Normally, to access the beach there are very few people that are actually
going there on a regular basis. But on canoe regatta days that beach is packed with canoes and
paddlers, and youÓve got probably close to 2,000 people in that area. So I wanted to try and see
if we could work out an accommodation because they were acquiring additional parking stalls. I
understand their concerns over the type of system that theyÓre putting in, which is basically a
card and theyÓre not going to have a manned both. So they were concerned about, you know,
how, how do you use that to -. Cause in other places youÓve got
a pass and you use that pass. And theyÓre not going to have it manned so theyÓre thinking how to
do that. They were concerned that if they provided the parking stalls outside of their parking that
instead of being actually used by people accessing the shoreline that it would instead get filled up
by people who are employees who work in the village area; and it would end up with no public
access because it would be just employees parking there all day long. So I understand thereÓs
EXHIBIT C
4
some issues in terms of how to try and accommodate public parking without, for access, without
having it turned into just parking for people who work in the area who will hog it all day long,
cause weÓve had that issue occur in other places where we have free parking.
So on No. 5 I think we ought to try and work something out and see whether some
accommodation can be made perhaps with their card trick system. If somebody goes in and
parks and wants to get public parking, they go to the front desk to get a placard that they have to
put back on their car; and I donÓt think that thatÓs much to ask of the people parking. But
perhaps thereÓs something that can be done with the system. And IÓm not married to the idea of
30 stalls, you know, because 30 stalls was really based on hotels that have access to much bigger
beaches. And so, you know, 30 may have been asking for more than was reasonable, given the
size of the beach. But I always thought that I should try and ask for more and see whether we
can negotiate from there.
And then the other recommendations that they have here, I have no opposition to, except No. 8.
I think it should read that ÐA solid waste management plan, including demolition waste, shall be
submitted.Ñ Because in addition to just demolition waste you have to have a regular solid waste
management plan for what you do after you finish your operations. And thatÓs usually basically
that they have commercial haulers pick up their rubbish and they provide a site for that. And we
thought that it should be more inclusive. But other than that I donÓt have any problems with their
recommendations here.
WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any further questions of staff? Maybe we can
finish this all up in one shot. So if you donÓt mind, Mr. Mooers, let me switch this around a bit.
I have only four people here who have signed up to testify. So let me call those four people up Î
Laura Dierenfield, Greg Gauthier, Mikahala Roy, and Charles Flaherty. For Laura and Charles
weÓve already sworn you in so you donÓt need to get sworn in. But for the other two could I
swear you in. Would you raise your right hand, please? And do
truth now before the Planning Commission?
ROY: I do.
GAUTHIER: I do.
WATANABE: Thank you. And why donÓt we start with you, Mr. Gauthier. Name and
address, please, and you can begin your testimony.
GAUTHIER: Aloha.
GIFFIN: Aloha.
GAUTHIER: Commissioners, Chair, Bobby Jean, aloha. Welcome to the west side.
This is only my second time, oh, first time being at this new commission. It looks a lot the same
from the back side, up here, but I think far more beautiful and handsome. But then, are there any
points there? No?
EXHIBIT C
5
My name is Greg Gauthier. I live in Kamuela, PO Box 6412, 96743. I represent the 150
employees of the King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel. I represent the Hawaiian employees,
I represent the Filipino employees, I represent the Japanese, the Portuguese, the Pacific Islanders
and the haoles, of course, too. These employees are the most loyal, the most enduring, the most
patient, the most patient employees that IÓve ever had the blessing to be fortunate enough to be
elected to represent. TheyÓre the reason I sit before you today. These people need a fighting
chance, not as an affront to the beauty and meaning of the Heiau and the luau grounds but as a
compliment to its perpetuation. These people need a fighting chance to perpetuate their
commitment to Kona. Out of the 150 employees at the King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel,
approximately half are working consistently. The other half are anxiously waiting for that
fighting chance. In the peak tourism markets of 2004 through 2007 our workers had the
opportunity to more than double their salaries in many cases as labor was short, and the glory of
the King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel had lost much of its luster.
When I asked our housekeepers, our cooks, our landscapers, why do you stay? The customers
are shunning us here to visit newer, more beautiful resorts furt
always answer, ÐThis is my home, this is my ohana, this is my culture,Ñ and we just need a
fighting chance. A fighting chance came in the form of Pacifica Hotels. They saw the
employees, they saw the Heiau, they saw, somehow, saw through the rust, the age, the broken
pipes, the crazy lease agreements, and saw the spirit and the po
Their plans and investment have been an oasis of hope in this desolate economy. Our employees
now finally have a fighting chance. They now have a reason to believe that their culture will be
preserved. They now tell me, see, Greg, this is why we stayed, soon the tourists will come, and
they will see and be reminded why the King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel is the most
beautiful, centrally located, culturally diverse, culturally sensitive hotel in Kailua-Kona. The
Heiau will still be honored. Access will still be granted. Culture will still be the centerpiece.
This renovation is our fighting chance for survival. ItÓs not done in spite of cultural preservation,
but itÓs done because of it. So we humbly support King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel and
this particular proposal before you. Mahalo.
WATANABE: Well, fellow Commissioners, do we have any questions of Greg? Thank
you for your testimony then. Laura?
DIERENFIELD: Thank you for the opportunity to address you again. Again, IÓm speaking
on behalf of PATH. And this particular project is of, very near and dear to my heart, being born
and raised in Kona and seeing the opportunity to realize a dream. I think that was expressed in
the Kona Community Development Plan to connect Kailua Village in a unique way. As was just
articulated thereÓs a need to revitalize Kailua Village. This is a historic village. The
communities of KÒanapali and KauaÒi and Waikk have seen growth in their visitor market
because they have things like shared use path that enhance a visitor experience. For residents
who enjoy being down at Kamakahonu Bay and paddling, swimming, doing all kinds of
recreation in that area, they need access as well. And we see a huge opportunity to connect
Kailua Village in a very unique way through a shared use path as part of these renovations. It
was encouraging to know that Na Ala Hele, the County Planning Department and the applicant
had met to discuss some alignments. ThatÓs the first IÓve heard of it. IÓm a little concerned, I
guess, about hinging possible alignments with the cooperation of neighboring landowners not
knowing how they might feel about that. However, we would encourage that kind of
EXHIBIT C
6
collaboration to find some kind of an alignment between the AliÒi Drive, the pier area, and
Makaeo, the Old Kona Airport Park, which does have quite a bit of parking and hopefully will be
a wonderful new park with canoe facilities and other recreational facilities, that could connect
the community to Kailua Village.
We did provide you with a letter detailing several of the benefits to a shared use pathway. I have
to say a 10-foot easement would not be enough in my opinion. I think weÓd have a lot of traffic.
And 10 feet it would be the minimum of the path itself, but you need some shydistance. So we
encourage that to be a bit wider. This map that we provided to you in the form of a letter is jus
some possible alignments to basically skirt the perimeter. We acknowledge that these would
take away a significant amount of parking; so perhaps something else would need to be worked
out. But essentially thereÓs a number of different opportunities to try and connect the village.
And, again, we just think this is a once in a lifetimeopportunity to make Kailua Village a historic
village, the kind of place that we all want to visit as residentguests, and to really make this a
wonderful place for the community. Thank you.
WATANABE: Do we have, oh, go ahead.
BOWMAN: I do. Thank you, Laura. I want your opinion or, on these preferred
alignments that you see here. As I see it, and IÓm maybe not familiar that -. Maybe somebody
can tell me, where is Makaeo from here? Like it would be off, kind of towards that box over
there on the wall?
HOUSEL: To the left.
BOWMAN: Yeah, to the left, straight across. And you talk about connecting to
Makaeo. Are there any, is there any way you can get from the Old Airport other than the road
now?
DIERENFIELD: Well, IÓm sure thereÓs people in this room that are much more
knowledgeable than I am. But there is a sewer easement I believe that basically goes behind the
West HawaiÒi Today building that connects to the back of the parking lot. ThatÓs used frequently
by people just because itÓs fun to be able to run through the village or walk through the village
and, I donÓt know, thatÓs not really a, I think, a welcomed, you know, access for both the
property in terms of the risks that that poses for them, I suppose, and itÓs not necessarily the most
scenic, but that is, that does exist now.
My understanding is that there used to be access along the shoreline and somehow that was lost;
and thatÓs something that I donÓt totally understand myself, but itÓs unfortunate. And IÓm sure
Na Ala Hele would know more about that. But those two alignments, I mean, it would be great
to do that but I just, itÓs, IÓm not sure how the neighboring landowners would feel about that. So,
I donÓt really know -.
BOWMAN: Because my concern is with the red alignment, I mean, yo
road but what does that mean? Where are those people going to park? I just donÓt understand
how that alignment would be beneficial for anyone because going
subdivision? IÓm sorry I donÓt know the name of it.
EXHIBIT C
7
WATANABE: Kona Bay.
LEITHEAD TODD: That subdivision has in front of it a seawall, which is considered to be a
public access. If you come from the Old Kona Airport, you can walk in front of those homes.
Questionable in my mind in the future whether that, you know, is going to be a good alignment.
But if you went along the purple line, then theoretically that would follow the coast, and end up
in front of those homes which are directly in front of the park, okay? If you follow the red
alignment, then that takes you by the gated entrance, and then you would have to either go from
there down along the path towards the ocean where the public access currently is.
The reason there are two alignments there is one, I think, one that, you know, a lot of people
would like to see is the purple one closer to the ocean, but the thought was that we might not be
able to negotiate that with the property owner next door, and that because unless they are coming
in for some kind of permitting, we donÓt really have a mechanism to get public access across the
property; and the red alignment allows, though, access to the anchialine pond area, which is quite
extensive back there and thereÓs been some community expression of trying to clean that up and
restore those ponds because Î I think you can see the water feature by the red Î itÓs quite
extensive. I walked it recently, and was surprised at how big that area is. So I think itÓs -. And
that one, because itÓs following the edge of the property line, we thought perhaps it was easier to
actually get from a property owner because it falls between their property and neighboring
properties. And the reason the purple one we thought might be difficult to negotiate with the
property owner is because that brings people into their little inlet there and by the homes and
stuff, we thought that that might be difficult. But I think, you know, weÓd like to be able to try
and negotiate both of them, you know. And I think in terms of the public they probably would
prefer the purple, but I donÓt know exactly how accessible along the shoreline, the rest of that
shoreline is, because that break, the breach in the wall has been there I think since the 1950Ós or
Ó60Ós. It was some time ago that they created that little inlet back when I think Thurston was the
property owner of that.
BOWMAN: And, and some of that is in the Historic District, right, in the red -. I wish
I had an overlay of exactly where the Historic District is. But thatÓs, quite a bit is -. Maybe you
can show us, Maija?
COTTLE: Yeah, actually the historic -.
BOWMAN: I know Heiau, yeah.
COTTLE: The historic and cultural sites are mainly down here. But the Historical
District is two parcels, and it comes right across here and then cuts down towards the beach -.
BOWMAN: Could you also just -.
COTTLE: So this area here would be in the Historical District.
BOWMAN: Thank you. And could you also just highlight where the present luau
grounds are?
EXHIBIT C
8
COTTLE: They are right about here.
BOWMAN: Thank you.
WATANABE: Okay. Any further questions? Thank you for your testimony. Mikahala?
ROY: IÓm going to ask if Chuck can go first.
WATANABE: Oh, okay. Mr. Flaherty?
FLAHERTY: Good afternoon, again, Members of the Planning Commission. Aelbert
Mahina Aehegma had asked me to read this; he left us, left meeting earlier, so he asked me to
read this into testimony. Uh, itÓs written very small.
This is testimony by Aelbert Aehegma, consultant for the Klana Huli Honua, now pro bono.
Kamakahonu, the Kamakahonu area including the rock AhuÒena Heiau stands on and is claimed
by the new owners of King Kamehameha Beach Hotel. However, there are unresolved issues.
One, the high watermark to west of the AhuÒena Heiau has been changed by a southerly facing
seawall. Previously, high tides could pass by the heiau and into the beach area. Therefore, no
building ownership is possible below the high water mark. Also, a cement path above the beach
causes the high water mark to change. I have seen the series of maps of the Kamakahonu area as
consultant for the Klana Huli Honua, and noted how the maps changed as historic
phaku/stones were moved and removed.
There is one letter claiming the beach was manmade; therefore, the high water mark did not
apply when a previous resort owner wished to build the pool area and other renovations. The
incursion historically on this most sacred crown land continues, unabated.
The lÒau grounds are built on a pond and burial. There are iwi, sacred to the Hawaiians, still on
the grounds. The HawaiÒi Historical Society, the Hawaiian people and the community are not
represented on the board dominating the care of AhuÒena Heiau. The hotel would never have
been built on this crown land, if the Hawaiians and community could not guide the care of this
Kamakahonu area. There is a large shadow on this Special Management Area Permit permitting
commercial interests. Please refuse their application.
WATANABE: Okay, thank you.
(Mikahala Roy circulated a map and photos to the Commission.)
ROY: Aloha Kakou. I am Mikahala Roy of P. O. Box 2388 Kealakekua,
HawaiÒi, 96750. I am a Kahu of AhuÒena Heiau, a title inherited by my father and from my
father, David Kahelemauna Roy Jr. who led the restoration of this temple for ÒOiwi and for the
world.
EXHIBIT C
9
Now that IÓve identified myself, while itÓs fresh in your mind, this is Kaiakeakua beach. This is
(inaudible) -.
WATANABE: Uh, can you hold on? I think Jeff will help you with the mike. We are
trying to get everything transcribed, thatÓs why.
ROY: Thank you. IÓm sorry.
WATANABE: IÓm sorry for the interruption.
ROY: Well, while itÓs fresh in our memory, this beach is Kaiakeakua. This great
beach, the remnant that you see here, extends all the way across town under the seawall. It is
great and glorious Kaiakeakua; it means the sea of the god.
IÓve read land covenant documents related to this property. For
Factors, descendant company of Hackfeld & Company, made an agreement with governing
bodies at the time, the State, to require all future landholders respect this very sacred land place.
Clearly the spirit of these land covenants is to hoÒihi mau, to respect forever to be sure that
AhuÒena Heiau and Kamakahonu will be respected forever. Serious challenges arose when IWF-
KKH took up their new management of the King KamehamehaÓs Kona B
harmony among people and serious degradation of the first restored Hale O Lono of the modern
era in HawaiÒi has occurred.
This landowner fails to do their part to help resolve challenges within this very sacred area.
They are so fortunate to be the landholder here, yet their actions do not demonstrate this.
AhuÒena Heiau, Inc. fails to respect traditional care by Òiwi, kanaka maoli, of AhuÒena Heiau.
This landholder and the State of HawaiÒi fail to keep current with laws to protect religion and the
civil rights related to the practice of customs of the faith of this land. Congress passed Law 9
341, The Freedom of Religion Act. H. T. Hayashi and newly formed IWF-KKH have broken
their promise, their requirement, to uphold the care of AhuÒena Heiau and Kamakahonu for the
community and certainly for Òiwi. Mr. Paul Allen who occupies the former Thurston Estate
presents deaf ears to the population who would be his kind neighbors.
The words to sum up the status quo at Kamakahonu resemble magma rising in an active volcano.
They only begin with ÐdeplorableÑ and Ðunacceptable.Ñ For these
Commission to decline this application at this time.
This is my testimony that went into their Environmental Assessment. They did not deem this
land place worthy of an Environmental Impact Statement like the community asked for. They
carried out an environmental assessment. This is my answer to i
report. Do you have access to that report? Okay.
AhuÒena Heiau is the first restored temple by Hawaiian people in the modern era. You would be
fascinated to know that it was on this coast that an earlier restoration by Hawaiian people took
place in about the Ó30s. But beyond that it is the only one. Instead of supporting the cultural
EXHIBIT C
10
care of this temple as was begun by my father, they have done everything to erode that and
created disharmony in the process. This is not a good land steward.
Next door the map that you have in your hand is a map that came forward from the people.
Nowhere in any public repository was this map found. This is a
series done in the Ó50s, and it shows the present Paul Allen estate. We tried to reach Mr. Allen to
ask him, wonÓt you please consider moving off of the sites that your home is on, and put this all a
part of this national historic landmark; in fact, we have asked both landowners to do the right
thing by Kamakahonu. This is a place for the community, yes, but can you imagine this place
for the Òiwi, for the people, the first people of this land.
There is a turtle stone that lies beneath the pier, and IÓve learned that in Fiji there is one, in
Raiatea there are three. What is the story of these things? But we wonÓt know, if all we clutter
our minds with is development.
Clearly they would not have this tract of land, if they did not promise people like my father,
people from this community, to mlama the memory, the people, the great leaders of this capital
site.
This is a, IÓll read to you now, editorial that came on 6/19.
ÐHeiau Access Questioned: Rarely have I experienced the warm welcome that I did on a recent
10-day visit to the Big Island. Everywhere I went, I was in complete awe of the unique beauty of
the island and its people. I had only one unpleasant experience and it was such a shocking
anomaly that I felt I had to share it. My friend and I visited the AhuÒena Heiau behind the King
KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel at sunset on our only afternoon in Kailua-Kona. We were
surprised to find that access to the heiau was restricted in the evening Î unless one purchased a
$70.00 ticket to a lÒau that used it as the backdrop for their performance and changing room for
their performers. Apparently even reading the interpretative sign was an intrusion and we were
forcefully escorted off the site after rudely being told we should swim to the heiau if we really
wished to see it. I have no problem with restricting tourist access È. In fact, I support it. There
is only one HawaiÒi and it is much too precious to be run over by tourists who canÓt possibly
understand or appreciate the natural resources of the island È. However, appropriating the
AhuÒena Heiau for a tourist lÒau and charging for entry is not just prohibitive for visitors
the local residents, it is completely disrespectful of the spiritual meaning of the site and the
traditional native practitioners to whom it rightfully belongs. Why does the community allow a
site of such cultural, historical and spiritual value to be appropriated for private profit?Ñ
My response: ÐIÓd like to thank Ms. Cushing of Oakland, Californ
purposeful letter. I applaud her for taking the time to write È. Kamakahonu, yesterday in time,
is a snapshot of a countryÓs capital, the residence of the Ruler of the Kingdom, in this case,
Kamehameha the Great. Working to promote a flourishing society, as rulers had before him,
AhuÒena Heiau was where the King honored the faith of his ancestors, presented his kingdomÓs
first flag, and departed his earthly domain, May 8, 1819. There were at least 15 sacred
components clustered to compose his enclosure. Jeweled by at least two Heiau, each with its
own Lana NuÒu Mamao (Oracles), these temples were among eleven temples of HawaiÒi Island
of that significance (the highest) of KamehamehaÓs day -.Ñ
EXHIBIT C
11
WATANABE: Ms. Roy, I hate to interrupt you, but I donÓt know how long that is. You
are not -.
ROY: Not much longer.
WATANABE: You are not planning to read through -.
ROY: No, not the whole thing. But you have the map -.
WATANABE: Yeah, okay, we did -.
ROY: Because this is particularly related to the map that you are looking at.
Would you take a look at that? I wonÓt be much longer. Please listen carefully.
ÐKamehameha erected the ÐHouse-to-see-the-GardenÑ (Hale Nana MahinaÒai, 54 feet by 131
feet) upon a house foundation built centuries earlier by his ancestor, King ÒUmi-A-Liloa.Ó From
that vantage point, Kamehameha could overlook his fishing grounds (koÒa) and his planting
fields È. Located near AhuÒena Heiau was the house foundation of the chief Keawe-A-Mahi
whose residence Kamakahonu was until Kamehameha acquired it È.
this land from the family whose members are noted in the island history. Asa Thurston, born in
Fitchburg, Massachusetts, led the first company of Calvinist missionaries here È.Lorrin A.
Thurston, his descendant, led a group of American businessmen in
73 years later. As Lara Cushing asks, Òwhy does the community a
appropriated for private profit?ÓÑ The answer is, there is more to it than what I read here.
ÐCommercial interests and businessmen protected by the State of
-.Ñ
WATANABE: Ms. Roy, Ms. Roy -.
ROY: ÐÒHistorical sitesÓ of the living faith of HawaiÒi. This is the same as
creating a -.Ñ
WATANABE: Ms. Roy, IÓm going to have to ask you to -.
ROY: ÐStatue of the living Pope and no longer allowing people to worship in his
church È.Ñ Sir, if you will, this is well worth your time. You will not hear testimony of this
kind. Please. This is factual -.
WATANABE: IÓm really sorry -.
ROY: And related to law.
WATANABE: IÓm really sorry, but youÓre going to have to wrap, okay, cause we have -.
ROY: Surely. I will. I will do that.
EXHIBIT C
12
ÐWhere title of the Hawaiian Islands is questioned, the title of Kamakahonu lands is questioned.
Both jewels referred to as AhuÒena Heiau are submerged in the sea daily. Submerged lands are
ceded lands Î the same as the whole of Mauna Kea. Clouded is the discussion of ÒcededÓ lands.
The whole of the islands are in this case. In the age of information,Ñ we are only now becoming
aware of this history.
The, one more point, the breakage or the, what Bobby Leithead Todd referred to as the break
way, was done illegally by the Thurston family. This was done b
They broke into Waiki Pond, and opened it up. At this point, Mr. Paul Allen does not care to
listen to his community about matters of the importance of the whole of Kamakahonu, the eye of
the turtle. Thank you.
WATANABE: Okay, thank you. Do we have any questions of Ms. Roy?
then thank you for your testimony. You may be seated.
IÓm sorry, Mr. Mooers, I was hoping I can make it all the way through, but can I take five, can
we take five, and then weÓll come right back in to deliberate on yours? Okay? LetÓs take five.
RECESSEDThe Chair called a recess at 3:06 p.m.
RECONVENED The meeting reconvened at 3:14 p.m.
WATANABE: Leeward Planning Commission back into order. Mr. Mooe
all the public testimony, and also heard the comments by Madam Director with regard to the
proposed, your proposed amendments. And it seems that now you understand her reasoning
behind the request for the public parking stalls and also her willingness to negotiate. So what
number between eight and 30 can we say is reasonable?
MOOERS: Zero is a number, right?
WATANABE: No, I said eight and 30, between eight and 30. You proposed eight, right?
Oh, IÓm terribly sorry. Yeah, let me swear you in. Would you all raise your right hand, please?
Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth now before the Planning Commission?
APPLICANTS: I do.
LIM: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My name is Steve Lim, P. O. Box 121 Hilo
96721, representing the applicant, IWF KKH, LLC. With me today to my right is Mr. Tommy
Henry who is the project manager, Mr. Jak Hu from the hotel, who is the general manager for
how many years now, and Greg Mooers, our planning consultant. What we are going to be
doing very quickly is to ask for your support in the SMA Permit. I think most of you probably
have stayed at the King Kamehameha Hotel one time or another. And the intent of the applicant
is to, as you heard from Greg Gauthier, is to bring it back to its former glory. We are already in
the process of doing interior renovations under our SMA approvals with the County. And what
you are going to be looking at now is the SMA Major Permit, improvements for the exterior
modifications to the hotel. IÓll let Greg give our project presentation, answer some of the
questions that weÓve talked about. IÓll then move down to Jak who can then give you some
EXHIBIT C
13
operational aspects of the hotel and where they are going. And also, weÓll, then weÓll lead off
and end up with the discussion of the proposed changes that the applicant has made as you see in
th
our letter of June 29.
WATANABE: Thank you, Mr. Lim. Go ahead, Mr. Mooers.
MOOERS: Thank you. I am Greg Mooers. My address is P. O. Box 1101 Kamuela,
HawaiÒi 96743. I am listed as the applicant for this particular SMA Permit. As Mr. Lim pointed
out, we have started the renovations of the interior, done on an SMA exemption issued by the
previous Planning Director, as the interior work is not considered Ðdevelopment under Rule 9.Ñ
The exterior work that we are proposing does require an SMA Use Permit. The fact that a
portion of the property that the West Tower is on is in the National, or Federal Historic District
necessitated an environment assessment. That environment assessment was prepared and
processed through the Planning Department. The Planning Department reviewed the
environmental assessment, the comments and our responses to comments, and issued a Finding
of No Significant Impact. Therefore, the EA was deemed adequate and addressed the issues.
That was published and it passed the challenge period; so that final EA has been approved.
I would like to expand a little bit on the project description to make sure that the record clearly
reflects some other potential improvements that are suggested in the plans that Maija did not
mention, most specifically on the West Tower. There is an existing restaurant on the first floor,
and part of the proposed improvements would include opening that up and having an exterior
patio dining area. Given the financial situation in the world today, we are not in the position to
make all the improvements immediately. So this would be phased
renovation is proceeding now, we will start hopefully shortly with the exterior renovations.
I would like to address some of the issues that were raised by the various testifiers. Ms.
Dierenfield was speaking about the trail access and I think you have in your files the responses
that we made to that, and thereÓs also a condition directly related to this lateral shoreline access
that Mr. Lim will discuss as we get to that point. The thing thatÓs interesting about this hotel is
that we do not own the land; we are lessees. So the issues that were raised in the letter, Mr.
Flaherty raised, about ownership of the hotel, we are not the owners, we lease. And if there is a
question about ownership or title, this is not the appropriate venue to discuss that. This property
does have title insurance. And the Department of Land and Natural Resources would be, you
know, the appropriate agency to address that, if there are concerns about the location of the
shoreline or other such issues; itÓs not an SMA issue and itÓs not an issue that should be decided
by this body.
We heard a number of comments about Big Surf Trust, Thurston Estate and Paul Allen; those are
all unrelated to our property and our project. We do have a very serious commitment to AhuÒena
Heiau. There is an agreement that Ms. Roy referred to that was drafted in 1991 and recorded,
and it specifies in here how the heiau and the lÒau grounds will interact, what rights are afforded
by the owners of the property, what responsibility is afforded, and itÓs very clear. And we just
want to make sure that as we proceed with this SMA Permit that nothing would invalidate this
agreement we have with the Board of Land and Natural Resources.
EXHIBIT C
14
I guess the last thing I wanted to talk about was the letter to the editor that was read by Ms. Roy
Î obviously a very unfortunate experience by this woman. But we did issue a response
immediately to that letter. Since Jak Hu signed that letter, IÓd ask him to, in fairness, to read his
response to that letter into the record as well.
HU: My name is Jak Hu, general manager at the King KamehamehaÓs Kona
Beach. Address: 75-5660 Palani Road, Kailua-Kona, 96740. This is a response letter to the
letter to the editor.
ÐAloha. I have read the letter to the editor regarding access to AhuÒena Heiau through our hotel
grounds at the King KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel. I was most disturbed as this letter does
not accurately reflect the situation and certainly is not representative of our feelings toward the
heiau or our visitors to our island. The staff in the management of the King Kamehameha
Beach Hotel understand and appreciate the cultural significance of AhuÒena Heiau, and always
comply with the covenants related to the conservation and preservation of the heiau. We have a
contractual obligation with the State to preserve the heiau, and are required to have the access t
open from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 300 days per year. This heiau was restored with a full
financial support of the hotel. We try to provide access to the heiau through our property at all
times. During the commercial lÒau especially allowed in our agreement with the Board of Land
and Natural Resources, we do have visitors in this area enjoying the entertainment and the
beautiful setting. During the lÒau the heiau is never used as a dressing room or a prop as stated
in the recent letter to the editor. This would be insensitive to the cultural significance of this site
and a violation of our agreement with the State. The performers change in the restroom area
adjacent to the stage Î never the heiau. We accommodate visitors to the hotel, whether to view
the heiau, walk along the shore or to enjoy our lÒau. I have checked with our staff at the lÒau,
and no one has ever restricted access to the heiau. We do realize the historical significance of
the heiau, and wouldnÓt deny anyone into the area. IÓm truly sorry, if Ms. Cushing was treated
discourteously during her visit. And for that I apologize. We are requesting the address of Ms.
Lara Cushing so that we are able to respond to her personally. Mahalo.Ñ
WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any questions? No? Thank you.
HU: IÓm the general manager of the hotel, and IÓve been with this ho
five years. And I was hired by HTH which is the previous owner, and now IÓm working for
Pacifica Hotel Company. When I started to work for the HTH Hotel Company, they closely lost
$70,000,000 in 14 years. When I started to work, I was the last
staff and all our people. IÓm the last hope. If I fail, we have to close the hotel Î that was the
situation. We went through it, we made it, and then they sold the hotel to Pacifica Hotel
Company. In last two years, Pacifica Hotel Company, they lost $6,000,000. On top of it we are
still spending money to renovate the hotel. This hotel was opened in 1976. In last 34 years no
one did renovation the way they are doing now. When Pacifica Hotel Company purchased the
hotel, I was ready to leave the hotel. They asked me why I wanted to go. I said, ÐI donÓt want a
rundown hotel. I donÓt want to run the rundown hotel anymore. ItÓs very difficult and tired.Ñ
And they told me they were going to renovate the hotel. The only one vision, and I said, ÐI want
to give the pride back to my employees. TheyÓve been waiting for this opportunity long time.Ñ
EXHIBIT C
15
Some people say weÓre looking for, only for the profit. We do a lot of donations; I get at least
five to ten donation papers on my desk every single day. Whenever there is a parade, who is
helping the parade? Our hotel. There is anything happening, people come and say, you know,
ÐCan you do this?Ñ We do. But I always remember I want to take care of my people first, which
is our employees. IÓm a salaried person. I come and go. I donÓt stay here. I wasnÓt born here, I
didnÓt grow up here. This is my career. If I can find another
our people, our employees. What I want to do is I want to give the pride back to our employees.
I know you guys are requesting the 30 parkings. ItÓs an unreasonable request. The hotel owner
is keeping on losing money. WeÓve got a hard time to pay the bill. Now we have to adjust
maybe some of our renovations because I lost $6,000,000 in two years. So they have to cover
my operation shortfalls. What IÓm asking is this: Please consid
this is the hope and pride to our people. Thank you.
WATANABE: Thank you. Mr. Lim?
LIM: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As you can see, the staff and the employees
feel very strongly about the success of the project. And I think that the applicant has gone and
taken significant steps towards proving that they have the ability even in these tough times to
renovate and reinvigorate the hotel.
th
Some of these proposed changes that we made in our June 29 letter are intended to both clarify
issues and update certain issues. And IÓll kind of go through those real quickly. The Planning
Director, for No. 4, has said that the addition of the last red sentence, ÐAccess to the Heiau area
will continue to comply with the agreement recorded January 10, 1991 between the hotel
operator and the Board of Land and Natural Resources,Ñ does intend to preserve the ability to run
the commercial heiau which was negotiated Î excuse me Î the commÒau that was
negotiated significantly a long time ago in the early 1990Ós. The property owner at that time was
required to file a restrictive covenant, and thatÓs what this agreement is being referred to as. So
weÓd ask for your support on No. 4.
No. 5, weÓll leave to last, which is the parking.
No. 6 is the clarification that we wanted to make that we will b
Environmental Management. At this present time weÓve done some
our engineers and plumbers, and we are not able to tell for sure whatÓs happening down there; so
we believe it is reasonable to include the condition, and that we will replace and/or rehabilitate
any deficiencies to existing sewer lines. I think we recently got the clarification from the
Department of Environmental Management that said that they didnÓt intend to require us to
replace all of the existing sewer lines. And so we are in agreement with No. 6, as well as the
Planning Director is.
The last condition is No. 8, the Solid Waste Management Plan. Our amendment would clarify
that the Solid Waste Management Plan was for the demolition waste, as the hotel is already in
operation and has a management plan. We also took that lead from Page No. 7 in the Planning
DepartmentÓs recommendations, which say that the Solid Waste Man
EXHIBIT C
16
the demolition waste. And so thatÓs why we put that clarification in there so that ours would
read that Ða Solid Waste Management Plan for demolition waste sh
WATANABE: Okay. Madam Director?
LIM: ItÓs about at the second paragraph -.
WATANABE: IÓm, yeah, IÓm following your lead; weÓre going to take No. 5 last.
LIM: Right. For No. 8, the -.
WATANABE: So you are suggesting that there is no need to strike ÐforÑ and insert
Ðincluding.Ñ
LIM: ThatÓs correct. WeÓre just looking at the DirectorÓs recommendation Page
-.
WATANABE: Yeah, then so IÓm looking to the Director to see if sheÓs in agreement -.
LEITHEAD TODD: Yeah, I donÓt have a problem with striking Ðincluding.Ñ
WATANABE: Okay, okay. So then it seems we are at the juncture where only No. 5 is in
question. The rest would follow as proposed by yourself.
LIM: Thank you very much. The parking, public access parking has two issues:
First one is number of public access stalls; second one is the location of the lateral shoreli
access. And as you look at the graphic thatÓs up on the wall, thereÓre the preferred alignments Î
the red being the one that essentially runs through the back of the parking lot and the next to the
back-of-the-house facilities near the hotel, which we do not favor because of significant security
issues which we are already having, and that you donÓt want to run the public access down
through the back of the house of the hotel. We would prefer the purple alignment that essentially
Î I canÓt tell exactly where that is because itÓs not real clear on the photo Î but essentially what
we had proposed in our Condition No. 5 on the second bullet point, which states that essentially
if the Planning Department in the future is able to acquire an access easement over the parcel to
the west, which theyÓve been calling the Big Surf property or the Paul Allen property, the
applicant, meaning the IWF company, would provide a public acces
mutually agreed upon to the County of HawaiÒi across the hotel properties to facilitate a link
between the lateral shoreline access trail at Kona Bay Estates and AliÒi Drive. And we added
that provided that the agreement which talks about the heiau and the access and the operation -.
WATANABE: Yeah, so in other words the State agreement would supersede.
LIM: ThatÓs correct, with respect to the heiau area. We, you know, obviously I
donÓt think anybody wants to run a public access right through the heiau area.
WATANABE: Yeah.
EXHIBIT C
17
LIM: We feel that the purple alignment or something similar to that a
then going out into the Thurston estate, the Big Surf Trust property, then coming back along and
joining up with the lateral shoreline access that the Kona Bay E
along the seawall that they have there, would be in keeping with the SMA rules and regulations
with respect to lateral shoreline public access. We think that running the public access through
the back of the parking lot would cause us to not only lose significant amount of parking spaces
but would also open up the hotel like youÓve never opened up a private hotel property before.
WATANABE: Is that agreeable?
LEITHEAD TODD: Providing that we can work that out with Big Surf. I happen to think that
the purple alignment that follows the shoreline is the one -.
WATANABE: Is probably best.
LEITHEAD TODD: Preferred by the public, too.
WATANABE: Yeah.
LEITHEAD TODD: Because, you know, the idea is a shoreline access, and then that would
follow the shoreline and then hook up with the current public access in front of the Old Kona
Airport area, ka Makaeo.
WATANABE: Yeah, agreed, and the red would not occur anyway unless you had an
agreement with the other property owners, so -.
LEITHEAD TODD: And itÓs a less preferred access in reality.
WATANABE: Yeah.
LEITHEAD TODD: The one that goes along with shoreline is the one that I would, I mean, in
the past when I heard public testimony, it seems to me that itÓs been access to the shoreline area
there that has been preferred. I guess the anchialine ponds is something else that maybe we can
work out with Big Surf. But the public, I think, at least in prior hearings on various applications
in this area has always talked about shoreline.
WATANABE: Yeah, okay, so -.
ROY: (Speaking from the audience area) (Inaudible) do you know the DLNR
(inaudible)? (Inaudible) are you familiar? That was closed by the DLNR (inaudible).
WATANABE: Okay, the time Î thank you for that information Î but the time for public
testimony has passed.
ROY: (Speaking from the audience area) (Inaudible) you donÓt seem to know.
You are not up to date, is my point. IÓm giving you some current information. I hope you
appreciate that.
EXHIBIT C
18
WATANABE: Thank you. Okay, so it seems like we are -.
HOUSEL: Mr. Chairman?
WATANABE: Yes.
HOUSEL: I had a question of either Mr. Lim or the project director. In reading the
EIS and your plan, youÓre planning for 622 parking spaces, and t
minimum. Are those all existing now, or are you adding more par
MOOERS: We are adding more. The proposal is to remove the tennis courts and put
in additional parking. I think, when we talk about the parking, I think Jak will take the lead here,
but one of the things that I can point out is just this past weekend with the fishing tournament
and car show the parking lot was full. I mean we were looking for every stall we had. So itÓs not
like we are going to create 179 stalls that are not going to be used. But the decision to eliminat
the tennis courts and put in parking is because we need the parking.
HOUSEL: Okay, so you -.
MOOERS: So those will be added, yes.
HOUSEL: You do need that much parking then, huh?
MOOERS: ThatÓs why they are removing the courts, yes.
HOUSEL: Okay.
MOOERS: ThereÓs no point creating them, if we didnÓt need it.
HOUSEL: Okay. Well, I share the DirectorÓs concern that if the parking for public
access to the beach is external, that itÓs going to be a fight trying to get a parking space there.
There has to be some control over who can park there. Is there solution for that?
MOOERS: Well, yeah, we just received the recommendation this last week, and
frankly we were a little surprised, because I think the ownership of the hotel, and Jak will
probably respond to that, was a little surprised that after being here for, you know, for 35 years
that -. We donÓt dominate, we donÓt own all the way up to the beach; so the access to the beach
is not affected by this. So their belief was what we were doing
renovate the hotel; and now we are being asked to give up 30 of our stalls that had always been
controlled stalls. And so operationally we are trying to figure out, okay, how do we do that?
And we are looking at, you know, passes and -. And operationally, presently there is a guard
there, or a ticket taker, and we are trying to remove that person to reduce cost and go to a card
gate where you pull a ticket on the way in and on the way out pay with, you know, credit card,
which are being done in a number of hotels on the coast. So now, weÓre saying, okay, weÓve got
to give away 30 freebees or 20 or 10 or whatever the number is, weÓre trying to figure out, okay,
how do we do that? And one of the things operationally we looked at, we said, well, maybe if
EXHIBIT C
19
we move the gate back to the back corridor, that would create I think twelve to 14 stalls outside
of the gate, that we wouldnÓt have to worry about, you know, where these people are going. And
the other question is, how do you know if they are going to the beach or they are just parking
there going across the street to QuinnÓs or going into town to shop. I think it would be
unreasonable for us to be required to follow, or somehow validate where those people are going.
And so operationally itÓs a challenge for us, yes.
HOUSEL: Uh huh, okay, okay.
MOOERS: So thatÓs really, thereÓre two parts to the issue: WhatÓs the financial
implication of losing the stalls, and second part is, okay, operationally how do we do that?
HOUSEL: Right.
MOOERS: And IÓll let Jak try to answer those questions.
HOUSEL: I understand. Thank you.
WATANABE: Okay.
BOWMAN: I have -.
WATANABE: Yes, Ms. Bowman.
BOWMAN: Just a quick question. Mr. Lim, you noted that by having that, I believe
that access behind the parking lot, that it would open it up to lots of people coming through there.
But again, I still donÓt know where those people are going to come from. You know, they are
not going to park -. I mean, you talk about opening it up to this hordes of people, I just -. Maybe
you know where they are coming from.
WATANABE: Ms. Bowman -.
MOOERS: I think their proposal -.
WATANABE: They changed that, and I think the Director agreed that we are going to be
looking at the purple -.
BOWMAN: I understand. But IÓm still, but Mr. Lim, you know, dis
IÓm just wondering. Again, thereÓre two options. But what, I want to be, you know, maybe be
more cognizant of where these people are coming from, because I
MOOERS: I think whatÓs been proposed, and if you listen to Ms. D
comment, is that theyÓre looking for a multi-use trail; so you are looking at bikers and joggers
who work out in the village, running out to the Old Airport Park. And so I mean this is a
community, it will be a community asset. And I agree that itÓs also an asset to the hotel to have
public access and walkways and stuff. Operationally what we are saying is that this is not a good
alignment because the back of the house needs to be opened for deliveries, and people going in
EXHIBIT C
20
and out of the kitchen, the trash compactor, the grease trap, all that stuff is back there; thatÓs not
where you want to have people running unfettered. So that was the comment. But as far as
where the people are coming from, I think the proposal is that they will be community people for
recreation from either the park or from along AliÒi Drive, visitors, everybody using be able to
walk, ideally, to walk along the shoreline.
BOWMAN: Okay, thank you.
WATANABE: Okay. Any further questions? No? Then it looks like we are down to the
one sticky point Î some number between eight and 30, and how do we manage it.
HU: I have a little comment, you know, I want to add -.
WATANABE: Please.
HU: As you know, that we are losing money, and itÓs very hard to run the
business in these days. And then I was really shocked to see that actually, you know, the City,
the County is asking for 30, you know, parking stalls, free parking stalls. We do have a parking
stall for the public Î of course, with a charge. Even if we are charging, we are still losing money.
And then we are running the business. We get a hard time running the business, and then you
guys are asking for the 30 free parking stalls. ItÓs very hard to, you know, take it. And secondly,
how are we going to control that? You know, they asked me, we s
brainstorm on how weÓre going to control it. If push comes to shove, weÓve got to give; then
how are we going to control it? Where are we going to draw the line? WhoÓs going to watch the
parking lot? WhoÓs actually going to park there? And then we have, you know, leased State
land right outside our hotel; we let the people park their canoes. Supposed be seasonal in the
contract, now we let them park in there throughout the whole season. We donÓt ask them to
remove it. It just stays there because it doesnÓt disturb us. We are trying to accommodate, you
know, publicÓs needs as much as we can. I just feel that, as the operator of the hotel, this doesnÓt
really make sense to me.
WATANABE: Yeah.
LEITHEAD TODD: Okay. I have a couple of questions because -. So you currently allow,
what, Kai Òpua, Keauhou to store canoes on hotel property?
HU: Yes. ItÓs right outside, which is our leased land from the State.
LEITHEAD TODD: Okay. Well, thatÓs public access, too, I guess, in some ways, you know.
WATANABE: Can we count that?
LEITHEAD TODD: Uh -.
WATANABE: They are now -.
EXHIBIT C
21
LEITHEAD TODD: I was thinking that, you know, thatÓs to some extent, thatÓs a type of beach
access, you know, which serves the community, and they should be given some credit for that.
IÓm just wondering if there is any way that you can accommodate additional parking with the
proposed card that you are doing. If not, is eight the maximum you can give, or could you give
some more and then maybe we can try to work out some type of placard or something that
people have to go get from the hotel front desk to stick on their car? I donÓt know whether that
works or not.
HU: The problem is, you know, controlling is going to be very difficult.
LEITHEAD TODD: Okay.
HU: Just people coming to ask, you know, I just parked my car, I wan
down to the beach, give me a parking pass; but we donÓt really know that actually the person is
going down to the beach or not. ItÓs going to be -. Sometimes itÓs undesirable people who come
in and park their cars and that theyÓre having parties and they have those things. So you know,
and IÓm also looking at all different angles, and itÓs very difficult. And I always ask for some
advice from our staff, you know, sit down with the security. And itÓs going to be very difficult
for us.
WATANABE: But itÓs your testimony that you do provide parking for Kai Òpua and
some of the other canoe clubs -.
HU: Just, yes, for the canoes, you know, just a, you know, we tell t
know, you can park in there. And this is supposed to be seasonal. And then we just give them
throughout the whole year; we donÓt tell them to, you know, the season is finished, you have to
pick up your canoe and take it, move. We donÓt do that. We just let them leave it there, you
know, as long as it doesnÓt disturb us, we say, thatÓs fine with us, just leave it there. Because one
thing is they give us a business, too, yeah? They are very nice to us, and we want to
accommodate whatever we can.
BOWMAN: I have a question.
WATANABE: Yes, Ms. Bowman.
BOWMAN: I really understand. Unlike other hotels, Mauna Lani, Mauna Kea, most
people who go to the beach access will go to the beach, you are in a unique situation, and I really
feel for you. My question, again, you have a Kai Òpua canoe and you give them access during
the season to keep their canoe there only, not their vehicles.
HU: Throughout the whole year.
BOWMAN: Okay, throughout the whole year, their canoe. And then they take the
canoe by hand down to the beach.
HU: Yes.
EXHIBIT C
22
BOWMAN: Okay. And is that area -? I donÓt know, IÓm thinking in lieu of the
parking, can that be a condition that there be a certain area for the local canoe club? I mean, IÓm
just -.
WATANABE: Maybe, I appreciate that, but maybe we donÓt need to write a condition for
that; they are already performing that un-policed, and itÓs kind of a tradition for them, huh?
BOWMAN: Okay. IÓm just trying to maybe solve the problem of the additional -.
WATANABE: I appreciate that.
BOWMAN: Thank you.
LEITHEAD TODD: Well, I was thinking if the hotel was amenable to that, then you know, that
would be acceptable to me that there be included in this that, and you know, obviously you canÓt
accommodate every canoe in the world there, but that you provide
and particularly Kai Òpua, I was thinking, because this is the area that they practice for a year
around. And then, you know, to me that serves some of the public purpose, and then we can go
with the eight stalls. Is that okay?
LIM: Okay, weÓll agree -. Is that okay with you, Tommy? Basically -.
HENRY: Yeah, State land, though.
LIM: Right. So long as the Commission understands that this is State land; we
have it under license. So subject to whatever State approvals we need, and we are willing to
accept that as a condition. We would assume that the eight stalls, we were trying to count them
out on our plat plan, but we can accommodate those outside the existing guard booth by moving
it down just a little bit. And those would be essentially open for the public but difficult to
regulate.
WATANABE: Yeah, and we realize that even if, even if you had it inside of the gate, it
would be the same thing. What are you going to do? Follow them? You know, same thing. So
I think we are fine that way. Do we have any other concerns?
LEITHEAD TODD: I was thinking that it might even be possible that if there Î I donÓt know
whether it works or not Î but you know, something that perhaps on special event days that, you
know, organizations could work out an agreement with the hotel to police that parking and
reserve it for their organization.
HU: You know, depends on, you know, what kind of function is your first
thing, however -.
LEITHEAD TODD: Yeah, yeah, IÓm just saying, if there is some kind of a function thatÓs in
that area like the regattas, you know -.
HU: Sure, we can -.
EXHIBIT C
23
LEITHEAD TODD: Then that would allow them to perhaps -.
HU: You know, like we have Ironman and those days, yes, we accommodate -.
LEITHEAD TODD: Yeah, okay.
ROY: (Speaking from the audience area) There are also handicapped people that
come to swim there on a regular basis. They need access and par
now.
WATANABE: Uh -.
HU: You know, handicap parking is, you know, there is, right next to the
banyan tree area, there is -.
ROY: (Speaking from the audience area) (Inaudible) two stalls or three.
DoesnÓt cover it (inaudible).
WATANABE: Okay. So are we in agreement in principle then? Then maybe for
clarification purposes then, so we know what we are making a motion on, we are taking the
DirectorÓs recommendations with a revised Condition 4, certainly a revised Condition 6 and a
revised Condition 8 exactly as proposed by Mr. Lim in that letter dated June 29. Now, what IÓm
not completely clear about is, how are we going to word Condition 5, which I think we agree in
principle there is going to be eight free parking stalls -.
LEITHEAD TODD: Uh huh.
WATANABE: Right?
GIFFIN: Uh huh.
WATANABE: But there was also some talk about this canoe storage, which they are
already doing. But are you planning to word any of that into this?
LEITHEAD TODD: Mr. Lim, I was wondering, if we had some language at the end that says
Ðand allow storage of canoes,Ñ and is there a way to describe that area in front of the hotel?
LIM: ÐAnd allows the storage of ca-,Ñ Ðcontinued,Ñ I guess, Ðstorage of canoes
at the licensed parcel owned by the State of HawaiÒi adjacent to the project.Ñ
WATANABE: Okay, this would be inserted as what -?
LEITHEAD TODD: Right after the Ðfree parking stalls.Ñ
WATANABE: Okay, so this would be another bullet then, yeah?
EXHIBIT C
24
LEITHEAD TODD: Yeah.
WATANABE: So, do you want to limit the, or put some reasonable l
canoe, so itÓs not, like, open? Or do you think thatÓs not going to be a problem? IÓm just
thinking, you know -.
LEITHEAD TODD: I think the area only physically can accommodate a certain number. I
donÓt think itÓs been an issue. Does Hotel have some concerns about limiting the number?
HU: You know, normally I leave, we leave it up to the Kai Òpua Canoe Club
since they are managing the area; you know, they are supervising it.
LEITHEAD TODD: Okay.
WATANABE: Okay, so, is everyone clear on the revisions that we were discussing?
HOUSEL: I had one question.
WATANABE: Yes.
HOUSEL: On the addition to Condition 5, weÓve changed the first paragraph with a
bullet. Does the second paragraph remain as is?
WATANABE: Well, no, we added a third paragraph in between, first and second and that
paragraph would be the third bullet, which is continue to allow storage of canoes in the State
lease area subject to -.
HOUSEL: Right, well, the paragraph -.
WATANABE: Am I correct on that? We are in agreement in that, right?
HOUSEL: Yeah.
WATANABE: We are just adding a third bullet point right in the middle of the existing
two.
HOUSEL: Okay.
MOOERS: I guess what I heard was a question about whether the second paragraph
that we recommended changes on, if that was changing. Was that the question?
HOUSEL: The paragraph that talks about the -.
MOOERS: Public access.
HOUSEL: Public access easement. Is that -?
EXHIBIT C
25
WATANABE: Yeah, my impression is that that stays as is.
MOOERS: As proposed, you mean as is by as we proposed changes -.
WATANABE: Yeah, right, exactly.
MOOERS: Okay.
LEITHEAD TODD: Yeah, because it doesnÓt specify a specific alignment, itÓs just weÓre going
to try and get what we can get. And I think, you know, the public probably prefers the one along
the shoreline, and thatÓs what we would try to get.
HOUSEL: Okay.
LEITHEAD TODD: But itÓs obviously subject to them coming forward and also working out
with DLNR any issues that they may have.
HOUSEL: Right, right. So my main question is, does this stay in there?
WATANABE: Yes.
HOUSEL: It does. Okay.
WATANABE: It does, yeah. Okay? So weÓre all clear on all of this? Okay. So youÓve
got everything you want Î just a little condition about, you know, continuing to allow them to
store the canoes, right?
MOOERS: Thank you.
WATANABE: All right. So with that, if everybody is clear on the revisions to the
conditions for this SMA Permit, would you care to make a motion?
HOUSEL: IÓll make it, if you donÓt -.
WATANABE: Thank you.
HOUSEL: Have me repeat everything you said.
GIFFIN: Maija has it. DonÓt worry.
HOUSEL: Okay, Maija has it, okay. IÓd like to make a motion that the Special
Management Area Use Permit, that we approve it to allow the renovation of the King
KamehamehaÓs Kona Beach Hotel, its commercial area, and related parking and landscaping
improvements on approximately 12.89 acres in the Special Management Area. I wonÓt go
further, but the motion is to approve this.
WATANABE: Yeah, as revised.
EXHIBIT C
26
HOUSEL: As revised.
WATANABE: Yeah, okay, thank you. Could I have a second?
GIFFIN: I second.
WATANABE: Thank you.
GIFFIN: YouÓre welcome. Is Maija going to read -? Okay.
COTTLE: Okay. So my understanding is that the motion is to approve as
recommended by the Planning Director, with the additional -.
WATANABE: Revisions as discussed.
COTTLE: Revisions from the applicantÓs representative, plus the addition of a
second bullet, or third bullet actually, under No. 5, stating Ðallow continued storage of canoes on
leased State property next to project site.Ñ
WATANABE: Yeah.
COTTLE: Is that correct?
GIFFIN: Uh huh.
WATANABE: Good.
COTTLE: Okay. Commissioner Housel?
HOUSEL: Aye.
COTTLE: Commissioner Giffin?
GIFFIN: Aye.
COTTLE: Commissioner Beaudet?
BEAUDET: Aye.
COTTLE: Commissioner Bowman?
BOWMAN: Aye.
COTTLE: Commissioner Iokepa?
IOKEPA: Aye.
EXHIBIT C
27
COTTLE: And Mr. Chairman?
WATANABE: Aye.
COTTLE: Motion passes, six-zero.
WATANABE: Okay, thank you. So Mr. Lim and Mr. Mooers, you will
writing.
MOOERS: Thank you.
LIM: Thank you very much on behalf of the applicant.
The discussion ended at 3:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Noriko Sauer, Secretary
Leeward Planning Commission
EXHIBIT C
28