My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-07-02 TDJSMLL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-07-02 TDJSMLL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:08:38 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:08:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
processes which they have, you know, they can hold us up on, and we understandthat; <br />and were not taking that as a threat, but were looking at continuing the dialogue. <br />And I did point out, just for the record, that the zoning does allow a 120-foot story <br />building. You know, the original plans for this area with the old HiloCDPwas for multi- <br />family. Multi-family also allows a 120-foot building. <br />Again, the commitment and then, again, weve tried, will be trying to keep the building <br />within the height limits allowed under the single-family zoning regulations; and that has <br />been part of the design that weve done, you know, just on our own. So there has been an <br />attempt; and well continue this dialogue, again, assuming that we can move forward. <br />And that really, again, thats really all I have to offer in terms of response. And, again, <br />Id be happy to answer any questions. <br />SPRINGER:Thankyou.Commissioners,doyouhaveanyquestionsfor <br />Mr. Moore? Mr. Moore, I have a question that came up, a comment that was made in the <br />field and then was voiced again during the testifiers time before us, and thats with <br />regard to the three-foot elevation change. And can you give us a reference point for <br />where that three-foot elevation change is from the lay of the land as it is now or some <br />other point? <br />MOORE:Its from the front of the property. <br />FANG:Three-foot elevation change, okay. Because the ground is rolling <br />or its going up and down, and the grading is up and down, so we need to say theres a <br />three-foot elevation change is partially correct. But, you know, some places will be <br />shallower, some places it will be higher. Thats probably an average value. <br />SPRINGER:Okay. Thank you. And thats just a question that has come up a <br />couple of times. So thats an average value. Some places it would higher, some places it <br />may be less than that. <br />MOORE:Yes. Clearly, now in the low spot itll be higher than that. Other <br />parts of the property will be at existing grade, so its not taking the property and raising <br />everything up. Again, there are portions that well just be maintaining existing grade, <br />portions that will be filled more. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Moore. Im awfully glad to hear that the window <br />is still open for dialogue with members of the community, as I heard that correctly. <br />Commissioners, any questions of the Applicant? Commissioner McCall, followed by <br />Graham. <br />MCCALL:Okay. Now in your plans, you are putting drywells in, which I <br />believe will, are supposed to hold that ten-year -. <br />FANG:Thats correct. <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.