My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-07-02 TDJSMLL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-07-02 TDJSMLL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:08:38 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:08:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
something that goes back to the Department of Public Works. But thosehave been my <br />reservations; but, at this point, Im inclined to vote in favor of the measure. <br />Is there any further discussion? Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Could I ask a question, I think, of the Planning Director or <br />someone on the Planning staff. We were concentrating on flooding today but I know at <br />the last meetingthe community spoke a little bit about issues of massive building, and <br />Commissioner Alameda spoke a little bit about the character, right now hes concerned <br />about the character of development and all. At some point I did look through the Zoning <br />Code a little bit and it seems like we have sort of a different situation where a commercial <br />property abuts other commercial properties versus where its sort of the end of the <br />commercial area and its abutting residential properties. It seems like I saw in there <br />somewhere that the Zoning Code requires on a commercial development that abuts on <br />residentialpropertiesthesamesetbacksthatresidentialpropertiesmustadhereto,but <br />maybe thats on the side boundaries and not on the real boundary. So if theres any kind <br />of setback or whatever issues that would help to mitigate a large office complex with <br />parking right next to residential properties thats already in the Zoning Code that we can <br />rely on or -. I dont have any expertise and understanding of that issue particularly, so I <br />just want to bring that up. <br />YUEN:If thats a question, Im not sure what the setback is for this. There <br />would be a landscaping requirement between a residential and the commercial. We really <br />have more information about that, Jeff? <br />DARROW:The setback for this particular property is going to be front and rear <br />15 feet and then the sides are going to conform to whatever is the adjacent zoning, so the <br />adjacent zoning in this particular situation is Single-family Residential. Depending on <br />the size of those lots well be able to determine the setback whether its 8 feet or 10 feet <br />or 15 feet. So this property will have to conform to that setback. But when youre <br />looking at a retaining wall, thats a different item. That actually can be set up to the <br />property line. But structures will have to comply with the setback. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners, further discussion? Motion has been made by <br />Commissioner McCall and seconded by Commissioner Smith with a favorable <br />recommendation on this matter be forwarded to the Hawaii County Council. Is there <br />any further discussion? Hearing none, Jeff, do the roll call. <br />DARROW:Thank you, Madam Chair. Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Aye. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Smith? <br />30 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.