Laserfiche WebLink
HAYASHI:Well, actually, I think you may be reading it correctly if you do it the <br />way it's written. Perhaps we could just delete that first sentence, and it still would give the <br />Applicant the alternative of either going toward, using the Old Government Road as access or <br />the Homestead Road. <br />YUEN:Although if we delete the first sentence, we do need to say something <br />about what they do, what they have to do, and specify that they, that if they use Homestead <br />Road, then improvements to Homestead Road and to the intersection would have to meet with <br />the requirements of the Department of Public Works. Because E currently does not say that, if <br />you delete the first sentence. <br />KUBOTA:I hate to argue this -. <br />YUEN:This -. <br />KUBOTA:Belabor this point, Mr. Chair, but it doesn't say that to begin with, to <br />me. <br />HAYASHI:Well, maybe just to further clarify -. On Condition F, if you notice <br />Condition F says that Homestead Road, and again this would be Homestead Road, if that is <br />used as an access, then it would have to meet with the requirements of the Department of <br />Public Works. <br />YUEN:That's right, it's already in F. <br />HAYASHI:Yes. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner -. <br />HAYASHI:So if the Director agrees, then we can take that first sentence out on <br />Condition E. <br />YUEN:Yeah, I think F is, F will work. <br />KUBOTA:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:So, Norman, the first sentence in the revised E will be stricken? <br />HAYASHI:Correct. And it will start with "should the access for the subdivision." <br />YUEN:No, but I think, you know, reading it again, I think F then would need <br />an additional sentence referring to the intersection because F only saysnGnldrsd`cQn`c+he <br />used to provide access, shall be widened and improved along the property frontage meeting <br />with the requirements of the Department of Public Works.o@mcGnldrsd`cQn`ccndrmns <br />5 <br /> <br />