Laserfiche WebLink
NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Department. <br />1) BJ Leithead Todd was unavailable due to being asked to attend <br /> <br />County Council Meetings. <br /> <br /> <br />Protocol for Kona CDP Action Committee Members. <br />2) Amy Self stated that she needed <br /> <br />to clarify two sunshine law issues. <br />  <br />a)If more than 2 committee members show up at a public meeting (for example a County <br />  <br />Council or Planning Commission Meeting) and one of the committee members chooses <br />  <br />to testify, they could be in violation of Sunshine Law. Should there be a reasonable <br />  <br />expectation that the issue of whatever you are testifying about happens to come to the <br />  <br />Committee later for some sort of recommendation or action then you could be in <br /> <br />violation of Sunshine Law. Marni Herkes requested clarification that should committee <br /> <br /> <br />members don’t testify and just show up. Amy Self stated that was fine. Ken Melrose <br /> <br />requested clarification in the context of what was just stated and the agenda for Place <br /> <br /> <br />Makers for the Honokohau TOD Charrette that will be occurring during this coming <br /> <br />week where there are open public and design session meetings, would three Action <br /> <br />Committee Members be able to participate at any one time. Amy Self stated from her <br /> <br />understanding with the Planning Department, whatever comes out of the charrette is <br /> <br />going to be adopted as Planning Department Rules and will not come before the KCDP <br /> <br />Action Committee to discuss. <br /> <br />b)When Action Committee Members testify as individuals at any kind of board meeting, <br /> <br />councils, or committees, you have to remember you are wearing “two hats”. For <br /> <br /> <br />example, if you are testifying in front of the Planning Commission or Council, it’s not <br /> <br />good enough to tell them you are testifying as an individual and another sentence later <br /> <br /> <br />you tell them you are a member of the Kona CDP Action Committee, that’s what’s going <br /> <br />to be remembered and misleading. If you are testifying as a member of the public, you <br /> <br />can do that but do not state that you are a member of the Kona CDP Action Committee <br /> <br />unless the Kona CDP Action Committee takes a vote to have a member of the Action <br /> <br />Committee represent its view in front of a body, then it’s completely fine. You want to <br /> <br />say you are testifying on behalf of the Action Committee and this is the view of the <br />Action Committee. Ken Melrose commented so the instruction from Counsel is we say, <br /> <br />“I’m Ken Melrose. I’m testifying as to my opinion.” Amy advised that this is the correct <br /> <br /> <br />action. <br /> <br />Presentation on Honokohau Transit Oriented Development Charrette by Place <br />3) <br /> <br /> <br />Makers, Inc. <br /> Suzan Henderson of Place Makers, Inc. gave overview of 2 step process that <br /> <br />the community will be experiencing during the charrette – 1) that they shall be calibrating or <br /> <br />customizing the Kona Community Development Plan’s Village Design Guidelines to fit the <br /> <br />nature of Kona and 2) that they will be master planning the Honokohau Transit Oriented <br /> <br />Development (TOD) utilizing the development Kona specific calibration. <br />The Village Design Guidelines (VDG) were based on the Smart Code and taken from a <br /> <br />national standard model. The focus is on getting the community voice to help shape physical <br /> <br />data: setbacks, civic space, etc. First thing is based on concept of transect (natural habitat) <br /> <br /> <br /> that shapes human habitat – density, heights, setbacks, civic spaces, thoroughfares, etc., a lot <br />of different terminology. Traditional historic developments change based on urbanity – <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />