Laserfiche WebLink
immediately surrounding Ka -loko Honokohau to compatible activities. Lands further <br />mauka should be restricted in density in order to preserve the integrity of the park and <br />protect its water resources <br />The State Land Use Commission determined that, "for all proposed development adjacent <br />or near a National Park that raises threats of harm to the environment, cultural resources, <br />or human health, precautionary measures should be taken to protect the National Park <br />cultural and natural resources, even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully <br />established." <br />In 2006, Hawaii County re- classified the adjacent to and south of Kaloko Honokahau <br />National Historic Park from "open" to "urban expansion' . This change to the general <br />plan failed to properly consider impacts to traditional and customary practices and to <br />public trust resources. The change simply reflected a desire to accommodate the demands <br />for development and failed to be based on all the studies documented as a deterrent to <br />destroying the natural resources and cultural beauty of this area. Consequently The <br />Jacoby Development proposed, in partnership with Hawaiian Home Lands, to build a <br />marina and timeshare project. That development project is no longer on the table for <br />consideration. <br />Kaliko Chun and myself are part of a lawsuit challenging the county's failure to protect <br />Native Hawaiian rights and public trust resources as well as its failure to plan properly. <br />Hawaii County Planning Director Hobby Jean Leithead Todd is proposing to reclassify <br />the area back from `urban expansion" to "open" - a classification that will better protect <br />the natural and cultural resources of the area. <br />The proposed amendment implements the Kona Community Development Plan's "vision <br />of a 17 mile long protected stretch of open coastline from Makaeo north to Kikaua Point <br />at the Kuki'o development." LU -1.6. is also consistent with the plan's call for a 1000 <br />foot setback from the shoreline. Policy LU -1.5 states, " it shall be a priority of the County <br />to maintain a minimum of 1,000 -foot open space no -build setback for undeveloped lands <br />adjacent to the shoreline. On parcels which currently exceed 1,000 feet in depth, Policy <br />LU -1.5. provides discretionary land use approvals such as SMA major permits, rezoning, <br />and state land use boundary amendments." <br />As a concerned community member, and in particular, a Hawaiian indigenous to these <br />islands, I fully support Hawaii County Planning Director, Bobby ,lean Leithead Todd's <br />proposal to reclassify the area in question from urban expansion to open. <br />l4Mahalo. <br />2 <br />