2005-07-15 GOLDING - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SPRINGER:We wont know until the vote. GOLDING, G.:Okay, were fine with it. SPRINGER:Thank you. Then if we could continue with our discussion for the next 10 minutes and maybe well get to a good point of conclusion. Mr. Roland? ROLAND:I would just like to add to this general discussion that Building M is designed to the features of the land and has a function and it wouldnt be easily accomodate-able into a functional use for crafts and other meetings and so forth. Maybe we could bridge from that building to one of the buildings and make it one building and get the square footage or something. Maybe theres a way of getting around all this and so that particular structure is (inaudible) one function and it wouldnt suit the other. SPRINGER:ThankyouMr.Roland.Isthereanyfurtherdiscussiononthismatterthen from either the Commissioners or the Planning Director? Commissioner McCall? MCCALL:Yeah notwithstanding Mr. Rolands comments I would be comfortable with Mr. Yuens idea in gen- as a general thing about perhaps allowing Building M to have some, some office or meeting place uses. I am generally uncomfortable with approving 2 other buildings with the idea even if we limited. Im just somewhat worried about the whole scope of this situation and as Mr. Salavea says what you know notwithstanding what youre ideas are we cant control what happens 5 or 10 years from now. If these buildings are built and your plans do not work out while the permit only says they can be used for these things it would be very difficult and I would not want to put a Commissioner 10 years from now in the position of saying no you gotta leave those buildings vacant. It would be very- it would be difficult not to approve- I dont know auto repair facility or whatever in that, in that same position. And you know if you guys had sold the property there would be no control over it and the permit we give goes with the property not with the owner. So, Im generally uncomfortable with the full expense of the situation. SPRINGER:Thank you Commissioner McCall. Before I call on you Commissioner Watanabe I do have a procedural question based on Commissioner McCalls testimony. Denial of a portion of this application does not preclude subsequent application does it? Or if it does for what time period? YUEN:One year, it precludes subsequent application for a year unless there are substantial change in circumstances. SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioner Watanabe and then the applicants. WATANABE:Yeah, my question is for the applicants. You indicated that Building M is not suitable but do you have any suggestions from the buildings that are being recommended for approval? Meaning P1, P2, L1? EXHIBIT B 32