Laserfiche WebLink
DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> KERN: So, then SHPD called one day after sending a number of letters <br /> and then they said do not send us another letter, this process has stopped, stop sending us letters. <br /> You need to go through the agency, you need to go through the Department and they're the ones <br /> who communicate with us. And that's what this language is correcting is the State Historic <br /> Preservation Department request that it goes through the agency and then what we're trying to do <br /> here with Commissioner Vitousek is find the efficiency and the effectiveness on the process. <br /> DEFRANCO: So, we're trying to strengthen the process so that everything is <br /> protected, right. <br /> KERN: So, what I want to try to avoid is the appearance that things are not <br /> being protected. The processes are being followed. I would say in some cases it's not efficient. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. So, efficiency. <br /> KERN: Yes, but it's not that if they don't respond or don't respond, it's <br /> like okay go ahead and just bulldoze it. It's like, no, we want a response, or you can hire an <br /> archaeologist. We really do make sure that's taken care of. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. So, we're just coming up with some extra language in here <br /> to make sure that the process is efficiently being done for the applicant and for the land and for <br /> the County. <br /> VITOUSEK: Again, I think that we can go on forever on this, but I think that the <br /> recommendation that I have is that we leave that language in place for now because it is in line <br /> with administrative rules. It doesn't really change it. <br /> DEFRANCO: It would be in affirmative place still if we leave it the way it is. <br /> VITOUSEK: I would leave the, I wouldn't amend the language as its being <br /> proposed. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: My motion was that we do not amend that particular section. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: Of it. <br /> DEFRANCO: All right. Is there any further discussion on this point, or can we <br /> bring up some other, oh, that was a motion that we need to vote on. All right. Is there any <br /> further discussion before we vote on this motion? <br /> 19 <br /> EXHIBIT B (DRAFT) <br />