My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-04-20 DRAFT Joint Meeting Exh B (Proposed Amendments to PC Ruls 8 & 9)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2023
>
2023-04-20 Joint
>
2023-04-20 DRAFT Joint Meeting Exh B (Proposed Amendments to PC Ruls 8 & 9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2023 4:18:53 PM
Creation date
6/1/2023 4:18:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LIN: Okay. <br /> JACKSON: —prior to Act 16, the minimum shoreline setback was 20 feet, <br /> statewide and the County applied a 40-foot setback however, we did allow exceptions to that <br /> based on the lot depth. So, what Act 16 did is they took away the ability for the County to have <br /> that exception and now any lot along the shoreline has a minimum 40-foot setback regardless of <br /> their lot depth. <br /> LIN: Okay, got it. Thank you. <br /> DEFRANCO: Yes, Commissioner Duarte. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Yes, for Commission Rule No. 9 the proposed amendments. When <br /> using the term adverse environmental or ecological effect and trying to minimize adverse effect. <br /> Can you help me understand how that is measured and quantified. It says here, minimize extent <br /> practical and is clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interests shall <br /> include, but not limited to potential community impact of individual developments and so forth. <br /> So, how is individual, a cumulative effect of individual developments measured and quantified. <br /> JACKSON: Can you point to where you're speaking to in the rule. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: It's Commission Rule No. 9. I'm sorry, I'm looking at the packet <br /> and not the slides. It's in our packet background and recommendations. It's on Page number 5. <br /> JACKSON: 9-5? Did you say 9-5? <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Page number 5, page number 5. <br /> JACKSON: And you're on number 7, is that correct? On Page 5, number 7? <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Yes. <br /> JACKSON: Okay. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Yes, yes. <br /> JACKSON: Okay. I'm sorry, can you repeat your question? <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Yes. <br /> JACKSON: Now that I'm looking at it. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: So, in determining cumulative impact, effect or impact. Help me <br /> understand how are we measuring cumulative impact of individual developments? How do we <br /> 7 <br /> EXHIBIT B (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.