2003-07-18 tkapoho - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Again, I think it just, it helps us put out the resources in advance of our impacts is why weÓre offering that language up there. It just makes it an easier decision to go and do it. YUEN:My suggestion would be that the, IÓm not comfortable with having no timeframe for Final Subdivision Approval. My suggestion would be that we say that ÐThe signal shall be installed within three years and Final Subdivision Approval secured within 10 years.Ñ The 10 years also, you also have the possibility of an administrative time extension for 10 years, which gives you 20 years. And we s change in our wording in the -. What happens if you do not meet your conditions? YouÓre still zoned, except for the last sentence in L, ÐShould any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Director,Ñ it the currently says, Ðshall initiate rezoning,Ñ weÓve been trying to put in Ðmay initiate rezoning to another designation.Ñ And thatÓs my suggested wording on this. MOORE:Just to be clear, that was, Ðthe traffic signals shall be done in three years and,Ñ or is that Ðor 10 years?Ñ So is it a mandate that we need to do it in three years under your suggested language? YUEN:Yes. Yours was mandated in five, right, no? MOORE:No, it was mandated as tied to the subdivision so, Òcause we have to have subdivision in five years. So our traffic signals, if we advance it, thatÓs our choice. If we donÓt, then we have to do it as part of subdivision improvements. So we donÓt have to, again, what weÓre suggesting is we did not have to do the signals independent of subdivision. We can choose to do that; because o choose not, we do not move ahead then thereÓs no impact from this project. If we choose to do it, thatÓs our risk; and weÓre willing to take that risk. YUEN:Give me a couple of minutes to think about how to do this. FUJIKAWA:In the meantime, is there any other question? Commissioners? KUBOTA:While theyÓre thinking about it, that was my original concern, that they have five years. So if they choose not to do anything about the traffic signaling, then they would just have 50 percent of the money from the other applicant and not enough to complete it. So my question was, do they have the five-year time span? And Mr. Moore came up with this idea of accelerating it because it is a necessity and itÓs for their benefit as well. And I donÓt know where the lack of time limitation not being there for the subdivision creates a hardship on anybody. Because it s to come up with the final plan for the subdivision already in here. So what is the confusion? I think weÓre getting the better deal by having them accelerate the traffic signals, installation of it; and I think itÓs a good suggestion, personally. I may be missing something totally, but tell me if I am. GRAHAM:My sense wasnÓt that they were accelerating the traffic signals, but he was proposing to decelerate the subdivision that they, you know, the traffic signal part 23