My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-07-18 tkapoho
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-07-18 tkapoho
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:33:46 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:33:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOORE:Yes. The second revision that IÓd like to offer is in the next <br />sentence. We have to submit our plans within one year. Right now, we have to secure <br />Final Subdivision within five. What we would like is to add language which allows us to <br />accelerate this process, is that ÐFinal Subdivision Approval or completion of the traffic <br />signal improvements shall be secured within five years.Ñ And that allows us to <br />aggressively go after the signal improvements and put those in first, even before we <br />subdivide. But once we put those in, then we are sure that we can subdivide, weÓre not at <br />risk on our zoning in the future after weÓve expended funds. So itÓs either reach Final <br />Subdivision or we put in the signals. <br />KUBOTA:Where are you, please? <br />MOORE:IÓm sorry, this is the second sentence of Condition B. It <br />ÐFinal Subdivision Approval shall be secured within five years from the effective date of <br />the ordinance. <br />KUBOTA:Okay. IÓm there now. Go back to what you were -. <br />MOORE:Yes. Okay. What weÓd like to offer is an amendment that <br />say that ÐFinal Subdivision Approval or completion of the traffic signal improvements <br />shall be secured within five years.Ñ That allows us to move independently on the traffic <br />signal to put those in ahead of time and then, again, be assured that we donÓt, our <br />rezoning is not at risk, so it doesnÓt -. You know, once weÓve expended significant funds <br />then our zoning is secured. But, again, what this means, and weÓre willing to do it, is to <br />work with the previous developer on their signal, the timing of the signal, and accelerate <br />that, and do it now. If we do that, again, we donÓt want to be at risk in five years when <br />we come in for subdivision, if we havenÓt met the time condition, to lose our zoning after <br />weÓve expended funds. So this just gives us that flexibility of putting the signals in; and <br />based on that, then, weÓve secured our zoning, weÓve complied with our performance <br />conditions. <br />And this is new so I apologize. We just thought, in response to some of the concerns <br />about timing, so weÓre just talking about this. And, again, the subdivision process, we <br />have go through tentative, we have construction plans. Under the best of circumstances, <br />thatÓs a couple of years process, normally. This way we can move aggressively on the <br />signalization separate from the subdivision, which is the intent. I think, as Norman <br />characterized it, that is the intent. <br />If I may continue, or if there are any questions on that? <br />FUJIKAWA:Any questions on this, Commissioners? Go ahead, Commissioner <br />Graham. <br />GRAHAM:You said this way we can move aggressively on the, I mean <br />without this change, you can certainly move aggressively anyway. Right? <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.