2003-07-18 tnextel - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

FUJIKAWA:Yeah, I think, weÓll have the Planning Director answer to this. SPRINGER:Thank you. YUEN:I think thatÓs a good point. We donÓt have a specific condition on that. I think we should have a condition that said something like, that access would be allowed. IÓm not sure how to qualify that, though. Do you have a suggestion on how it should be determined who would have a claim of access to, for cultural practices on the heiau? SPRINGER:That was going to be my next question on how we verify authenticity. But I wonder if -. ThatÓs an outstanding question and concern that is raised up here, but perhaps we should be considering for future applications as well. Could we just take the language out of the application, Ðshould there be legitimate access claims of this feature?Ñ Again, on page 10 -. FUJIKAWA:Planning Director, you want a few minutes to review this and -. YUEN:ThatÓs a possibility. Why donÓt we discuss that with the Applicant when they come forward. And I do think we should have a conditi the specific wording. SPRINGER:Thank you. FUJIKAWA:Any other question from the Commissioners? Go ahead, Commissioner Graham. GRAHAM:I have just a couple sort of minor points. On the archeological section of our Background Report, seems like there was a sequence of events where the DLNR Historic Preservation Division initially said thereÓs no effect. Then the Applicant informed them of the Mamala Heiau and then the DLNR staff said they would conduct a field check of the site and may submit revised comments. Then the Applicant subsequently submitted a report prepared by a consultant anticipating no significant impact. IÓm just wondering if the DLNR ever did follow through and do that field check they indicated they would do, or if theyÓre planning to do that, DARROW:Good question, Commissioner Graham. I did follow up on t had spoken to Mary Anne Maigret with DLNR Historic Preservation Division. She said they did conduct a field check, they did concur with David ShidelerÓs report, and that they were going to resubmit a follow-up to this. But as of this date we have not received that. But she did say verbally on the phone that they did not anticipate any adverse impacts from the proposed tower site. And she said she would try to get it in by the date of the hearing, but as of this date we have never received it. GRAHAM:Thank you. One other small thing. The pole is like an 80-foot pole. And when IÓm reading the visual impact section, my sense 3