My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-07-18 TKONACDP
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-07-18 TKONACDP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:37:21 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:37:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
currently exceed 1,500 feet in depth;” I can live with that. But I don’t know if that’s a <br />substantive amendment or not. <br />YUEN: Yeah, I would say that’s a substantive amendment. And -. <br />WOODWARD: All right, well, you know, I will be happy to suggest that to Council. <br />Everything else is fine with me. I think they’ve done a great job; it’s an incredible document. <br />But I do think that should be changed. It’s not enough for me to vote against it; it’s not enough, <br />you know, if an amendment is going to require it to be delayed, I’m not willing to do that. But I <br />think we ought to send it to Council with that recommendation. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Anyone else have any comments? Well -. <br />PALMA-GLENNIE: Steering Committee might all end up up here. <br />WATANABE: I did promise you a chance to make further comments after testimony. <br />You are also part of the Steering Committee? Is that correct? I know Mr. Melrose is, but -. <br />PALMA-GLENNIE: Yes, I am on the Steering Committee. <br />WATANABE: Okay. <br />MELROSE: And I just came up quite honestly because this 1,000-foot setback is very <br />much Janice’s very important integral part in the dialogue on that part of it, and if she needed <br />more of support, I wanted to be here for her.And trust me, the two of us did not agree on this <br />when we began this process -. <br />PALMA-GLENNIE: This was our toughest point. <br />MELROSE: Took us weeks. I appreciate the comments and the questions that you all <br />raised. And I know you didn’t ask me back up for an opportunity, or allow me back up for an <br />opportunity just to rebut the members of the public that have come up here to do that. And I <br />don’t wish to do that except to point out that Mr. Barlow’s concern about alternate energy <br />technologies is addressed in the Energy Policy 1.5 where there is distributed energy distribution <br />and alternate resources; there is a policy here that deals with that. Mr. Murata’s concern about <br />Mamalahoa Highway is very legitimate. Chapter 4, Transportation System, real focus for Kona <br />has been on connectivity and concurrency, and all of the legs in the first 16 that are listed there <br />are new pieces of road. So if you look at Transportation Policies 3.2 and 3.4 and Public <br />Facilities Policy 2.5, you’ll see that the maintenance functions and the safety level of service <br />components are addressed here not as a new component but as a developing as the other. And I <br />think that the issue that Commissioner Alameda raises about how do others get involved, other <br />good ideas get into the Plan is -, Page 5-7 has the duties of the Implementation Committee and <br />the duties of the Implementation Committee include responding to public questions and to make <br />recommendations for amendments and to initiate and coordinate actions for which the <br />community has assumed responsibility; so there is a mechanism here for the ongoing – it was <br />really intended – when we talked at the last meeting in Hilo about the Implementation <br />EXHIBIT D <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.