Laserfiche WebLink
This is a map that the applicant has provided for us to be able to show this particular subdivision. <br />Again just for reference, we have Holoholo Street coming from the south side of the subdivision <br />and Nana Street from the north side. Right directly in the middle of the subdivision is Kukuinui <br />Street. The darker shaded area is the area that we are looking at today for the time extension. <br />It’s not very much darker, but it’s this low portion here. The upper portion has been developed, <br />and you’ll be able to see the pictures that have been passed around. Originally, the first <br />increment of this subdivision was for 20 lots; again that part of the subdivision has been <br />completed. The applicant had one water commitment for both lots, and now he’s in need of 13 <br />additional water units to be able to complete the subdivision.We did have a comment letter <br />from the Department of Water Supply stating that the applicant will need to come up with an <br />additional source to provide those water commitments. The applicant has submitted as a <br />response to that letter, and that’s been passed out to the Commissioners. <br />The Planning Director is recommending that a favorable recommendation be sent to the Hawaii <br />County Council by the Planning Commission. Are there any questions? <br />ALAMEDA: Any questions? Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Where is the access or the ingress/egress for the particular development <br />going to be? <br />DARROW: This particular -, most likely, to access this particular subdivision would <br />be from Holoholo Street; that Holoholo Street enters from Kaiminani Drive. <br />ALAMEDA: Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Yes. I see in my file that they were supposed to submit final subdivision <br />th <br />approval – they had an extension that brought them up to April 5, wait a second, yeah, ’cause it <br />started April 7, ’97, that was the effective date of the Ordinance, and then they have five years to <br />submit final plan approval (sic) that brought them up five years more to April 5, 2002 – and so it <br />would appear that they are not in compliance. And somewhere in here I also read that they had <br />not satisfied Condition K, which was the affordable housing requirement. So when you add that <br />to the fact that there isn’t a water commitment yet for Increment 2, and the Water Department <br />doesn’t even consider that they will be providing it, but saying that the applicant has to provide <br />their own source, it seems that this is -, in a sense part of it was about the water appears to be <br />premature, and yet the other part -. Here we are once again looking at Conditions that have not <br />been met in a timely manner, and yet they could have applied for an extension of time, and did <br />not. <br />DARROW: The -, Commissioner Siracusa, the application was actually received on <br />th <br />April 5, so this particular application has been with the Planning Department since that time. <br />SIRACUSA: Two thousand and two? <br />DARROW: No. Two thousand and two was the end date of the original rezoning. <br />SIRACUSA: Right. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />2 <br /> <br />