2007-07-20 TKOHALA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

them for your discussion and action. And so that would be the first procedural issue that I would recommend, is that you confirm with the parties that they’ll agree to consolidate these for action; and then you go ahead and take that action. After you’ve consolidated, assuming you consolidate these two issues, then it becomes really up to you how you would want to handle it. I would think that at some point you would want to entertain a motion that would, well, you could possibly entertain a motion that would deal with everything in one motion, if it fits that way. ALAMEDA: Follow-up, Commissioner Siracusa? SIRACUSA: Follow-up questions, yeah. I don’t see how we could do one motion if one motion would be at the very least on the Change of Zone and the other would be on an SMA. It would seem that at the very least we would have to do two separate motions -. TORIGOE: Right. SIRACUSA: To keep it from getting too convoluted. TORIGOE I think you’re right. That would probably be the better way to do it. And, also, think about the relationship between the Rezoning and the SMA Permit. Basically, the SMA Permit ought to be consistent with whatever the rezoning is. ALAMEDA: That sounds good. Commissioner Siracusa, I think you’ve got it right. Commissioner Domingo? DOMINGO: Just from Jeff, you know, in the event that we revoke the Change of Zone Ordinance and the SMA Permit, then in the future should the owner decide to come in and develop that, then they would have to go through another rezoning procedure and an application for an SMA Permit? DARROW: If the applicants choose to develop it as it is now, a 50-lot subdivision, if the Planning Director’s initiative passes, then the property will be zoned RA-5 acres. So they could do, you know, a development on 5-acre lots. But, again, it would require the development to come before the Planning Commission through the subdivision of the lots for the Special Management Area Use Permit. DOMINGO: I just want to clarify that in my mind because I kind of heard you say once it’s revoked then they would have to come in for any application, for another SMA Permit; and if I heard correctly I didn’t hear you saying that they need to come in for another rezoning application. DARROW: Yeah, the Special Management Area Permit that they would need to come in for would be for the subdivision of the 5-acre lots, cause right now the property is approximately 38 acres. So they’d still need to go through the subdivision, which would trigger the requirement of a Special Management Area Use Permit. Thank you. EXHIBIT A 4