My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-07-20 TKOHALA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-07-20 TKOHALA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:39:20 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:39:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
to Jeff is a May 19, 2006 SHPD letter to Paul Rosendahl, April 28, 2006 SHPD letter to Paul <br />Rosendahl, May 8, 2005 PHRI letter to SHPD, May 3, 2005 PHRI letter to SHPD. <br />And to give some context in terms of the general area, this is property that is located just <br />immediately makai of the Kohala Ranch project. We believe it is consistent with the General <br />Plan and the Special Management Area Regulations in the area. In fact, when the project first <br />came through the Planning Commission and the Planning Department, the County of Hawaii <br />Planning Department’s recommendations stated the development will not have any significant <br />adverse environmental or ecological effect. They also stated in that recommendation and report <br />that “Although there will be a diminution of open space and alteration of the existing coastal <br />viewplane the project as proposed would have no adverse impact to recreational and visual <br />resources, access to and along the shoreline, nor coastal ecosystems”. The report went on to <br />conclude that “The proposed development is consistent with the objectives and policies as <br />provided by Chapter 205A, HRS, and Special Management Area Guidelines contained in Rule 9 <br />of the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure.” <br />It is our position that the Planning Director’s effort to down zone the private property without the <br />fee owner’s consent in this case is not supported by law, nor procedure, nor the County General <br />Plan. As you can see from the graphic up there on the site plan that the Planning Department <br />staff has posted, it’s in an area of development very close to a Multi-Family Residential zoned <br />area and immediately makai of something in the neighborhood of 800 acres of State Land Use <br />Urban which is that yellow that you see, which is zoned for potential density of approximately <br />1490 residential units and a golf course. Whether they actually developed that project or not, I <br />don’t know; but it has been zoned for about the same period of time. We don’t think that the <br />proposed zoning or SMA permit for this particular project is out of line. We think it’s consistent <br />with that area of North Kohala. In fact, this property is about 38 acres, round numbers. At RS- <br />15 zoning the total maximum density is something in the neighborhood of 110 lots. What we <br />have the Special Management Area Permit for is only 50 lots. <br />This particular client, Kohala LLC, has been in the process over the past year or so trying to <br />determine, once we get the SHPD clearance for the archaeological sites and the burials as to <br />where these preserved sites would be, it’s to then figure out what size of project he wants to do. <br />We’re looking currently at something less than the 50 acres (sic) but we’re not sure yet. So I <br />can’t any make commitments with that regard. But while we are essentially under attack on the <br />entitlements, we really can’t move forward any further. Thus far we’ve secured water and an <br />indication that the utility duct lines for the electrical have already been constructed under the <br />Akoni Pule Highway to the project. We’ve recently made a request of the Kohala Ranch Water <br />Company, which is a private water company servicing this area under, there’s an agreement <br />between the surrounding properties, we’ve made a request for the water meters. And what <br />happens after that is they will then send us what they call a “will serve” letter from the public <br />utility company that basically says “We will service your project if you will build these certain <br />water infrastructure improvements.” <br />The Condition L of Ordinance No. 97-102 has already been satisfied by the submittal of the <br />February 5, 1998 agreement to the County. We’ve satisfied the affordable housing requirements <br />of Condition L. Condition M of the Rezoning Ordinance related to submittal of a data recovery <br />plan for the archaeological issues, we’ve just recently completed all of the work for that. So now <br />EXHIBIT A <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.