Laserfiche WebLink
testimony is that -. I guess in his discussions with you, he indicated he was willing to <br />work with your company to, I guess, get the alignment so as to extend it mauka. And, <br />you know, I guess I don’t see it going all the way up to your mauka boundary. But it <br />would seem to me that as the wall, if you just extrapolate that line, you know, it goes up <br />maybe another, I don’t have the scale here, but maybe about three times more than what <br />Wes Thomas drew. If you just drew a relatively straight line further mauka, maybe four <br />times, it’d go like a third or a little bit farther up your boundary there. <br />LAU:Yes, we will be amenable to that. I think what you’re saying is <br />take the northern wall, draw a straight line to where it intersects the property line and <br />rebuild the wall. <br />IWASHITA:Yes. <br />LAU:Yes. <br />IWASHITA:Okay. Thank you. <br />WATANABE:Any other, Mr. Salavea? <br />IWASHITA:Then -. <br />WATANABE:Oh, just a follow-up? <br />IWASHITA:Yes. <br />WATANABE:Okay. <br />IWASHITA:Then with the, as far as the Director, the staff have any difficulty in <br />drafting that condition? <br />YUEN:It would have to be only if requested by the State because there <br />would be, whenever you do an archaeologic -.If there’s a restoration of the Judd Trail at <br />some point, it doesn’t make any sense to do it unless and until there’s an effort to restore <br />the Judd Trial with stonewalls along it and to open it up for the public. So it would have <br />to be only at the request of the State. What I’m saying is, you have a fragment and there <br />is a real question by archaeologists and by the State when you restore things, you know, <br />they don’t automatically think that it’s a good idea to put up walls that have been <br />knocked down. And we don’t know how they’re going to handle the Judd Trail in the <br />future, if it’s ever going to be opened up to public use. So just to go in and make 80 feet <br />of wall, to put as a condition that you have to go in and make roughly, I’m eyeballing this <br />and guessing we’re talking, you know, 60-80 feet of wall, there’s no point in doing that. <br />There may be a point in doing that at some point, you know, if the State decides that they <br />want to see a wall restored in the future.So that would be my take on that condition. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />22 <br /> <br />