My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-07-20 TD-Bar
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-07-20 TD-Bar
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:43:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPLICANTS: I do. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. Mr. Fuke, you’ve already stated your name and <br />address. But, Mr. Dickler, is that right? <br />DICKLER:Yes. <br />WATANABE:Yeah, would you please state your name and address for the <br />record? <br />DICKLER:Yes, thank you, Chairman. My name is Allen Dickler and the <br />president of Westpro Holdings, which is the manager of D-Bar Ranch. I reside at 75-399 <br />Wehilani Drive in Kailua-Kona. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. Now, has the Applicant received the material from the <br />Planning Commission, I mean, Planning Director, and are you satisfied with the -? <br />FUKE:Sure. <br />WATANABE:Recommendations? <br />FUKE:Thank you very much. Again, for the record, my name is Sidney <br />Fuke. I’m a planning consultant, assisting the Applicant on this matter. Yes, we’ve had a <br />chance to review the staff’s Background Report and the proposed Recommendation. We <br />found the Recommendations and the Background Report very comprehensive and <br />acceptable. However, relative to the Background Report, there’s one minor correction <br />I’d like to suggest. And that is like on Page 4, Item No. 20, it’s the section that deals with <br />the archaeological, historical resources; and left, you know, it just seems to imply that <br />Dr. Rosendahl’s archaeological report was the report that was accepted by the State <br />DLNR-Historic Preservation Division; but, in fact, like there was a subsequent survey <br />done by Haun and Associates back in 2005, and that was the report that was accepted. <br />And so what I would like to suggest just in the interest of clarity is after the first sentence, <br />the inclusion of the following sentence:“A subsequent survey was then conducted by <br />Haun and Associates in 2005.” And the rest can remain as it is. <br />WATANABE:Any comments from staff or the Director? Is that acceptable? <br />YUEN:No, that’s fine. <br />WATANABE:Okay. Thank you. So noted. <br />FUKE:Mr. Chairman and the Commission, I’d like to just kind of like just <br />share, although the staff’s report was rather, presentation was rather comprehensive, I’d <br />like to just kind of share a few information with the Commission for their information. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.