My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-07-20 TSamson
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-07-20 TSamson
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:43:39 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:43:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
agree with it. But in Kona here, we have a situation where back in 1990 and 1995 we didn’t <br />have the highway problems we have now, we didn’t have the infrastructure issues. So it’s like <br />I’m thinking, well, maybe it’s appropriate to look at this rezoning now on whether it’s <br />appropriate in the same way we were just saying because the situation in which it’s found is <br />quite different than it was when the original zoning ordinance went in. Could you comment on <br />that? <br />YUEN:Well, we don’t look at a time extension the same -. You look at it as, to <br />start off with as it does have the zoning. The purpose behind having these time limits though is <br />so that if the project is not developed and the overall situation has changed, if there has been <br />some significant change that would cause you to re-evaluate the wisdom of the zoning, that is the <br />opportunity to do that. So to give some other kinds of examples, if the General Plan changed for <br />the area, there was a big flood and it was learned that this property is affected by the floodway, <br />those kinds of situations could lead you to re-evaluate it. So it’s not an automatic that the time <br />gets extended, there is a reason for it. And if you as a member of the Commission feel that the <br />situation is so different that you would not vote for it, maybe you wouldn’t have voted for it in <br />the first place but now you’re looking at it, you say that you feel that whatever led them, that the <br />conditions have changed enough to call for a different take on it, you can vote, in your case <br />you’d be voting to recommend a denial. You can do that. We looked at it and still regard it as <br />an area where we would like to see housing built in Kailua-Kona, and so are favoring the time <br />extension. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />WATANABE:Any other questions for staff? <br />HAYASHI:Mr. Chair, just for your information there is this white colored sheet with <br />proposed conditions and this was submitted by the applicant. So I guess the applicant will <br />address the changes that they would like to see. <br />WATANABE:Thank you. Seeing that there are no other questions for staff, may I call <br />the applicants up. Would you raise your right hand, please. Do you swear or affirm to tell the <br />truth now before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />LIM:I do. <br />WATANABE:Would you state your name and address for the record, please. <br />LIM:I’m Steven Lim from Carlsmith in Hilo. With me to my right is Mr. Erik <br />Leuteneker who is chief financial officer for Betzel Brothers Construction. Betzel is a related <br />company to Samson LLC, the developer of the project. <br />Thank you for your attention to this matter, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Planning <br />Commission. <br />This project, as Mr. Graham was bringing up, had been zoned quite a while ago, I think at least <br />15 years. I was looking at the correspondence in the file and I might have been working on this <br />thing for 15 years also for the various developers. Essentially this is an urban core built-out <br />EXHIBIT B <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.