My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-23 TMEN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-07-23 TMEN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:45:36 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:45:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
So on the question of the demand for it, I’ll defer to Dr. Sugai. <br />HOUSEL: Mr. Fuke, I had one question. One of the testifiers is concerned about the dust and <br />noise control. How do you plan to manage that? <br />FUKE: Well, as far as the dust and noise control, it’s already, they have to address that by <br />complying with the State Department of Health; the State Department of Health has regulations <br />that govern noise and also govern dust control measure. So the contractors are obligated to <br />fulfill that mandate. Now, if there are additional type of things that the neighbors would want to <br />have, then this is where I think, like, during the plan review process where the developer would <br />be, if this condition were accepted, would be obligated to meet with the community, then these <br />can be faired out and hopefully additional mitigated measures can be taken. <br />HOUSEL: Thank you. Commissioner Bowman. <br />BOWMAN: I have a question before Dr. Sugai, if that’s all right. Thank you, Mr. Fuke, <br />because I think the public realizes that we are just the first step, and if we can address some of <br />these now, you know, it’ll be a lot easier when they get to the other side, yeah, the Council. <br />There was a question, just real, it may be minor, but about loading, about the loading dock being <br />abutting residential areas, and I noticed, when you were talking about including the neighbors, <br />that that wasn’t mentioned. So I just maybe suggest that that be a part of, which I’m sure it is. <br />FUKE: That was part of, the loading requirement is part of the parking requirement, so when I <br />mention parking -. The Zoning Code requires standard parking stalls, handicap parking stalls <br />and also loading zone requirement, so it was generic. But your point is well taken. <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. And one for the architect, because I’m not quite sure where the <br />eucalyptus stand is in relationship to the roads. And I just have a minor question with whether <br />eucalyptus roots -. Because I know we’ve had a lot of problems with our roadways and roots. <br />And I think, you know, for those who want to save the trees, I appreciate it, but is it, is the stand <br />of trees near where the access is going to go? <br />GHALAMFARSA: No, it’s not near the access. Mostly the south-west, there, in this area. <br />BOWMAN: Okay, that’s the trees. <br />GHALAMFARSA: Yes. <br />BOWMAN: Okay. Pardon my ignorance, but I just wanted to make sure that I address that. <br />Thank you. <br />HOUSEL: One question. What is the existing slope of the land right now? <br />GHALAMFARSA: The average slope is between 16 to 18 percent. <br />21 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.