My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-23 TMEN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-07-23 TMEN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:45:36 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:45:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HOUSEL: Could I ask you to please summarize your written testimony? <br />S.HOIST: Certainly. I realize that whether the property owners develop commercially or <br />residentially, their plans haven’t so far included saving the trees, but I’m hoping that we, the <br />County and the community can encourage them to do so in the future. Whatever development is <br />put in place, the trees should be considered worth saving and incorporated into the landscape. <br />Perhaps, they would be an excellent buffer zone desperately needed by the neighboring <br />residences. My hope was that they can be designated as exceptional trees by the County of <br />Hawai‘i. I understand that your, the County Code, Chapter 14, Article 10, 14-16 (sic) gives a <br />provision for this Planning Commission to be able to, you know, propose a development -. I <br />won’t read it to you obviously, if I’m running out of time. I haven’t shared this testimony, <br />though, so this is the first time you are hearing this. It says that you can request the advice from <br />the arborist advisory committee concerning the trees within any proposed development prior to <br />any grading or granting of final subdivision approval to assure that exceptional trees are retained <br />and to prevent the unnecessary destruction of such trees during development. The lack of <br />designation as an exceptional tree does not diminish the responsibility and the authority of the <br />Planning Department to recommend trees to be incorporated into the development plan. The <br />trees already meet many of these standards. They are very exceptional and they are very <br />historical, as you can see. If I don’t have time, I won’t read the rest of the explanation from the <br />Kona Historical Society about why these tress are very historical. Hopefully, you have enough <br />information that I’ve already provided you. <br />In summary, there are many reasons why this development should not be approved. These trees, <br />these trees need to be saved. They are structural elements of our traditional landscape, which <br />serve to remind and connect us to our history. Too much of the familiar Kona landscape is being <br />discarded in favor of new developments. Please require that the trees be evaluated and saved. <br />Thank you. <br />HOUSEL: Thank you very much. By the way, I want to let you know all of the document you <br />submitted will be part of the formal record. <br />S. HOIST: Okay, great, thank you very much. I will now speak for my neighbor, Teri McGuire. <br />“My name is Teri McGurie, and my home is located right next door to the proposed rezoning <br />development -.” <br />HOUSEL: Excuse me. Did you submit that document? <br />S. HOIST: Yes, I did. <br />HOUSEL: Okay, thank you. <br />S. HOIST: I won’t read her address – you’ve already had that. “Since I am unable to attend this <br />meeting, I wanted to make sure that my objections and concerns are heard.To start, I agree with <br />the other neighbors who border the property that such a development would have a bad impact to <br />a residential area like ours. My objections are simple: This should stay a residential zoning area <br />9 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.