My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-07-24 TPLACE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-07-24 TPLACE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:53:19 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:53:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of the lots. So if you purchased the lot you might have an area where you could construct your <br />home, but a portion of your lot would be dedicated to the maintenance of the existing botanical <br />garden. And as you’ve noticed in the plan is that the place is, residence is in one corner, and that <br />would be able to be subdivided out and kept separate from the garden. So this is really an estate <br />planning issue. But we have not engineered the road so the location of the road, where it’s <br />exactly going to go, how it crosses gulches, that all has to be, has to be engineered. And at the <br />time the subdivision is laid out it will be. The likelihood is that there will not be 14 lots; it will <br />be a number less than that. Fourteen is the maximum lots that could be created. But that’s the <br />process. <br />And according to the conditions being proposed we would have five years to develop the <br />subdivision and develop the mechanism by which the garden can be retained. But that is one of <br />the two goals, is to separate out the personal estate for their purposes, for the family’s purposes, <br />and then to have the garden maintained. Because up to this point Dr. Place has been, you know, <br />footing the bill. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Do we have any questions of the applicant or -? Ms. Bowman, <br />were all your questions answered? <br />BOWMAN: Just, it’s an existing nonprofit then, the garden is? <br />MOOERS: Yes, it is. <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Any further questions of the applicant? Geri? <br />GIFFIN:So this garden is currently open to the public? <br />MOOERS: Yes, it is. <br />GIFFIN:Okay. And then in the big picture down the road, do you envision this <br />garden to remain as a public visitation site? <br />MOOERS: That, that is the goal, yes. <br />GIFFIN:Okay. Thank you. <br />WATANABE: No further questions? If not, then you may be seated. I do have one <br />person from the audience that signed up to testify, and that would be Jeff Sacher. So if I could <br />call upon Jeff Sacher to come up, please. <br />SACHER: Good morning -. <br />WATANABE: Yes, Mr. Sacher, may I swear you in. Do you swear or affirm to tell the <br />truth now before the Planning Commission? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.