Laserfiche WebLink
constructed in the late ’60’s and at that time the shoreline was outside; and so this was built at <br />that time within its land where a portion of the shoreline certifi-, shoreline. This is the existing <br />two-story structure that’s in the parking area that will be removed in the future and this area will <br />be all used for parking. There is an access to the parking area onto Ali‘i Drive. Again, another <br />photo. <br />The Planning Director is recommending approval of these amendment requests by the Planning <br />Commission. Are there any questions? <br />WATANABE:Fellow Commissioners, any questions of staff? Yes, Ms. Bowman. <br />BOWMAN: I just have a question. I know that the certified shoreline was done <br />long, long, long time ago. Was there -? And I think maybe because it’s like up to, it’s a berm? <br />Can you see why there wasn’t a more recent one? <br />DARROW: Well, the actual shoreline was done in 1998 and recertified in <br />1999. This shows the shoreline at that time. If you’ll notice, it also follows an existing wall. <br />That wall becomes the stabilized shoreline until the wall is removed; so the shoreline remains <br />intact until that wall is removed. There are portions that you can see that come outside of that, <br />but again, when this was constructed, it was constructed, the shoreline was outside of that area. <br />There also is a portion here identified with a crosshatch; this is an existing DLNR easement that <br />they were able to get from DLNR. They were planning on extending the improvements out to <br />this area, but that would require another easement so they brought back to second- and third- <br />story, not to go beyond that area. <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. And just, and the existing pillars that hold up the <br />building – and I guess the applicant can answer this – I assume, are strong enough and, yeah, <br />engineering-wise strong enough to hold up two more stories. <br />DARROW: I believe in the application, the original application, it said that the <br />second and third stories would be constructed independently of the existing story. And again, <br />the applicant can confirm that. But it sounded like it wasn’t going to be depended on these <br />particular supports. <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. That’s right. Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Housel. <br />HOUSEL:Yes. Now, what we are looking at here is the first story, is that <br />correct? <br />DARROW: Correct. <br />HOUSEL:And then we are talking about going two more stories up then, <br />right? <br />DARROW: Correct. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />3 <br /> <br />