2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (3) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

GIFFIN:Mr. Vitousek? VITOUSEK:You know, since we were all asked to remain in our plac this recess, I think the record should reflect that during the recess, Ms. Roy and Ms. Trask were conferring with the witness and pointing out various things on the maps, and having extended discussion with the witness, since weÓre taking a break during her testimony to further point things out here on the map, which is a little irregular. I mean, usually you donÓt have the opportunity during a witnessÓ testimony to coach them. And, so, I think itÓs only appropriate that the record reflect that. GIFFIN:I agree in its appropriateness. Mikahala? M. ROY:Thank you, Mrs. Giffin. We refute what Mr. Vitousek has to say in the idea of the element in inference of coaching. We merely were directing Mrs. KanaheleÓs attention to the site map, acquainting her with what, catching her up to speed with what this area is and, also, that Kahala Ann is Mrs. Gibson, for the record. Thanks. Aunty Pua, this location, as IÓve talked more about the site plan that we pointed out to your left, this is actually that red dot on that other map just above you. This is a schematic representation of what is designed and proposed to be developed there by Mr. Blasman. As you see that -. TORIGOE:You need to have her be specific in terms of which map and where exactly she is referencing -. GIFFIN:Excuse me, Mr. Torigoe has just stopped me so that we can be specific in terms of which map and where, for the record. M. ROY:Thank you, for the record, the first map that IÓm speakin landscape plan presented by Wayne Blasman, as presented in this Contested Case yesterday and today. It is the revised map. GIFFIN:Exhibit -? M. ROY:Exhibit 17. The second reference was to Exhibit -. HAYASHI:ApplicantÓs Exhibit 17. M. ROY:The other one with the red dot, Norman? HAYASHI:Oh, thatÓs the staffÓs location map. 15