2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (5) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

M.ROY:Thank you. GIFFIN:Commissioner Springer. SPRINGER:So, Madam Chair, if I understand you, you are indicating that we are going to now get back to the portion of the hearing where we hea correct? th GIFFIN:Yes. As stated in our June 5 memo. SPRINGER:And Mr. Roy maintains a presence here and has throughout the hearings. I would have no objections to hearing the Applicant's witnesses out of -. GIFFIN:Okay. SPRINGER:Order. GIFFIN:One of the Intervenors expressed some concern in terms of housekeeping schedule, but before you do, Mr. Togashi, any input regarding the schedule and proposed change of schedule, first by the Applicant? TOGASHI:Personally, as one of the hearings panel, I didn't have any objection to having the written testimony and oral testimony of Mr. Bleck and GIFFIN:Okay. TOGASHI:As part of our evidentiary record. But, you know, we were talking about, I th guess, rules and adherence to rules, and I know that Ms. Giffin did -, has a letter dated June 5 to all the parties involved about, in fact, under Note 2, there's a statement that no changes to the th witness list shall be made after July 7. And, you know, we're all talking about adherence to rules. Personally, I don't have any problems to the admittance of these two additional testimonies, but since we're all talking about rules, I just wanted some input from Ms. David as well as the County Department, and I'm sorry, Ms. Roy, as well. GIFFIN:Maile. DAVID:Yes, with regard to witnesses, I would like to let you folks know that the three witnesses are prepared, my three witnesses are prepared to go on at one, two, and three this afternoon. They are being picked up as we speak. But Mr. Vitousek's request on whether he can squeeze in his witnesses, I would prefer that because the schedule is so tight this morning, that we go ahead and possibly reschedule his witnesses for a later date in keeping with the schedule that you've already sent. GIFFIN:Mikahala. 15