Laserfiche WebLink
death and I want to remember him as a good attorney, a very straight-forward, a <br />gentleman; and I know I will miss him. So, in his memory, IÓd just like to acknowledge <br />that, Mr. Chairman. <br />As the Planning Commission is aware, we have filed a number of e <br />Hearing OfficerÓs report. We support that report to the extent that it finds that there is a <br />strong legal basis for the grant of this permit; and we believe that her report contains all <br />of the findings that support, or provide legal support to the granting of the permit. And <br />so we would respectfully request that this body grant the Special Permit in this case. <br />At the same time, we have filed exceptions because we believe that some of the <br />restrictions that Ms. Broder has recommended to be imposed will cause hardship; and we <br />also believe on some of them, theyÓre not properly based on the proper basis. So, if I <br />may, IÓd like to go through that. And, along the way, I will just highlight the exceptions <br />that we feel are most important to our client. Along the way, I will making some <br />comments regarding some of the statements that Ms. Broder made h <br />because I feel I must take exceptions to some of them as well. <br />Let me start, and if the Commission is going to attempt to follo <br />st <br />exceptions were filed on July 1, and what IÓm referring to right now is page 7 of those <br />exceptions. And at the top of page 7 of those exceptions, we state that we take <br />exceptions to recommended Conditions 2 and 3. And I would add in this category No. 6 <br />as well. What Ms. Broder has done is, in those conditions, she has required that certain <br />things be done, certain improvements be made, certain approvals be obtained prior to the <br />conduct of the tour activity and the sales activity that weÓve applied for. As the <br />Commission may recall, we believe that certain of those activiti <br />themselves in the agricultural district, so those activities have continued on site. So to the <br />extent that Ms. BroderÓs conditions will require us to stop those operations, we would <br />object to those. We believe that the things that sheÓs requiring can be satisfied by our <br />client within a time certain after the, if this permit is granted within the time certain after <br />that. We will comply with the requirements that Ms. Broder has <br />record, IÓve mentioned Conditions 2, 3 and 6. And she went through this with you but <br />IÓll just, for the record, indicate the subject matter. <br />Condition 2 pertains to the improvement, water system improvements; and we heard her <br />say that she felt those should be done as soon as possible. WeÓre willing to do that within <br />six months after the permit is granted or Plan Approval is granted. <br />I will also comment that Ms. Broder was talking about the taxing of the public water <br />system because of the agricultural activity, and I think she made reference to the water <br />feature, the fountain, the pool, involving a lot of water. I think Ms. Broder must have <br />forgotten that during the hearing the evidence was that all of t <br />fountain, the pond, all of that is from a private well on this site. In other words, in <br />addition to the public system, our client is providing water for that fountain for irrigation <br />purposes, etc. So while there is water being used from the County system for agriculture, <br />itÓs supplemented by a private source. <br />12 <br /> <br />