Laserfiche WebLink
The 5.c, IÓm sorry, 5.e, we just would like some clarification. ThatÓs why weÓve offered <br />some language. Ms. BroderÓs Condition 5.e will prohibit weddings, concerts, <br />conventions, other types of special events and activities. Okay? We do not believe that <br />thatÓs warranted and -. Because what we said or what our intent was to say and, this, <br />again, was related to some fears that neighbors had that this particular property would be <br />used as a wedding place, a place to have weddings, commercial weddings, and there is no <br />intent to do that; and we would agree to have that prohibited. We agree that commercial <br />concerts, conventions, other kinds of special events that are commercial in nature would <br />not be allowed. What would be allowed would be events that are related to the coffee <br />industry. So if thereÓs something even on a commercial basis that promotes the coffee <br />industry, we would like to see that be able to happen on the property and, arguably, you <br />know, that kind of thing might be allowed under State law anyway. So our position on <br />that is that there are many events. As you may know, the Kona Coffee Festival has been <br />held at this property for years and thatÓs an example of the events that are related to the <br />coffee industry and are appropriate to be held on this property. <br />In talking, during the recess, IÓd also like to make clear that the Kona Coffee Festival is <br />attended by over 100 people. And so we do not expect that the 80-person limit on public <br />visits would be applicable to events like that. We donÓt consider the Kona Coffee <br />Festival a tour of the property. ItÓs more of a celebration from, you know, Kona farmers <br />and everybody else who supports the industry, who comes to the property once a year and <br />has a festival to advance the industry. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Tsukazaki, how much more time youÓre going to need? <br />TSUKAZAKI:Am I at 10 minutes yet? <br />GALDONES:You are 25 minutes already. <br />TSUKAZAKI:I apologize. And IÓll try to wrap it up. <br />GALDONES:Thank you. <br />TSUKAZAKI:I think the last one weÓre looking at is noise because that has been <br />an issue with neighbors for a long time. And what the Planning Director and Ms. Broder <br />have recommended is that the maximum sound level at the boundary of the property is <br />55 decibels. That is a residential standard, by the way. This is an agricultural area and <br />the appropriate sound level for an agricultural area would be 15 decibels higher, <br />70 decibels. That, in fact, was what initially was discussed with neighbors and then <br />Doutor also agreed to lower that to 55. But itÓs an extraordinary thing, you know. I <br />guess, if you can look at it in terms of fairness, neighbors would be able to create more <br />noise, 70 decibels of noise at the boundary. At the same boundary, theyÓd be able to <br />create 70 decibels of noise. My client can only go up to 55. So that is another significant <br />standard here. <br />16 <br /> <br />