Laserfiche WebLink
Then 21 describes the soils in the area. While the, this area is classified as Grade C <br />agricultural lands. Nevertheless, I think that itÓs a little bit ironic because this area of <br />Kona is not just good for growing coffee but is, you know, one of the best places in the <br />entire world to grow coffee. So while it may be classified as G <br />by the StateÓs assessment be classified as Grade C, in actuality this is a prime agricultural <br />area. And, as you know, most of the coffee that is grown in Hawaii is grown in the area. <br />In the past, there were a lot of agricultural activities on the property. There were <br />agricultural sites from pre-contact times; and the radiocarbon indicated that there had <br />been agriculture on the property as early as 1400. So the property was also part of what <br />they call the Kamehameha Great Fields; and they grew lot of things there. So there was a <br />site that the Applicant was supposed to preserve. But then after the period of grubbing, <br />the site was destroyed. So I think that this is something that I indicated in my <br />recommendation, that in the future the Applicant should be more sensitive to Native <br />Hawaiian culture and history in the area. <br />I also took, added that the Applicant shall provide access in the event of documented <br />gatherings that have been done in the past. There was no evidence submitted at the <br />hearing but, obviously, native Hawaiians have used the area before. That statement is <br />taken from the ApplicantÓs application. And because the applicant made that <br />representation at the point in time, I included it in the recommendation. <br />So I think that we could just skip now to page 28 and look at the recommendations. One <br />other problem that came up during the hearing was that the Applicant didnÓt have the <br />proper water usage calculation equipment and didnÓt have all the improvements that it <br />should have for water usage. I think that the Applicant needs to immediately make those <br />improvements. The applicants are obviously using a substantial amount of water in the <br />reflection pool and the water fountain, obviously, using a lot of water. The property is, <br />you know, in a dry area but it is very nicely green, and some of the foliage is quite <br />attractive. Bananas, oranges, lemons, as well as coffee is grown there. So the applicants <br />are obviously are using a lot of water and, you know, thatÓs a precious commodity in <br />Kona. So I think the Applicant needs to make the improvements as soon as possible on <br />the water usage. <br />In No. 3, we request that the Applicant put in heavy landscaping to assist in reducing the <br />noise and visual pollution for the neighbor. <br />No. 4, public tours and retail sales of non-agricultural products should be conducted in <br />conjunction with active cultivation on at least seven acres of coffee. This is proposed as <br />a coffee farm within agricultural district. And while I note in the ApplicantÓs exceptions <br />they seem to think that public tours without any coffee farms have somehow or other <br />become the main emphasis, that isnÓt the way the evidence came out of the, at the <br />hearing. The evidence at the hearing was that this was a coffee farm and in order to keep <br />the coffee farm going as part of Doutor CoffeeÓs benefits to its franchisees in Japan, that <br />these tours are offered and this is, you know, part of their efforts as growers of coffee. <br />5 <br /> <br />