Laserfiche WebLink
the success of the project, yeah? But I think weÓre just dealin <br />like the level of intersectional improvements at the Kuakini Highway and Sarona Road. <br />And barring some of the Planning DirectorÓs language, maybe if we can just stick to the <br />amended language and on the third line, if it reads like, ÐThe Applicant shall improve the <br />section of Sarona Road, including its transition from Kuakini Highway,Ñ and just add, <br />Ðincluding its transition from Kuakini Highway, meeting with the <br />Department of Public Works to accommodate two-way traffic,Ñ etc., etc., etc., etc. You <br />know, would that accomplish pretty much what you had in mind? <br />YUEN:YouÓre working from this page? <br />FUKE:Correct, yeah. <br />YUEN:Oh, boy. Hang on. IÓd rather start from scratch, then. W <br />your language, improve Sarona Road, including the transition from Kua -? <br />FUKE:ÐIncluding its transition from Kuakini Highway meeting with <br />approval of the Department of Public Works.Ñ <br />YUEN:Okay. Let me work from my version, okay? ÐIf the Kuakini <br />Highway/Sarona Road intersection improvements, planned by the County, are not <br />completed prior to occupancy of the hotel, the Applicant shall construct Sarona Road <br />improvements, including the transition from Kuakini Highway, meeting with the <br />approval of the Department of Public Works. In either case,Ñ and then the second <br />sentence remains the same. ÐIn either case, the Applicant shall improve Sarona Road <br />from the end of the Sarona Road/Kuakini intersection improvements to the western edge <br />of the property to accommodate two-way traffic meeting with the approval of the <br />Department of Public Works prior to occupancy.Ñ <br />FUKE:Correct. ThatÓs fine. <br />GALDONES:We got that settled. <br />EMLER:ItÓs understood by the Applicant that the present right-of-way of <br />Sarona Road is not wide enough to accommodate two lanes of traff <br />and, therefore, there would be some property that would be dedicated to the County as a <br />result of the improvement project. Is that correct? Is that your understanding? That <br />would be our position. <br />FUKE:ItÓs kind of like our understanding at -. This section of Sarona <br />Road, there may be sufficient right-of-way. I think itÓs more a question of like what level <br />of right-of-way that youÓre referring to. ÒCause if youÓre referring to like a 60-foot wide <br />right-of-way, then, it obviously takes off a sizeable chunk of t <br />EMLER:Yeah, we envision the improvements; and your reference to the <br />Kuakini Highway improvement plans, I think is a good reference in the sense that weÓre <br />14 <br /> <br />