My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-01-03 tkona
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-01-03 tkona
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:03:41 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:03:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Okay. Duane Erway and Tom Fine, Sr., please come forward. <br />They probably have already left. So we are in action mode. Commissioner Kubota, you <br />would like to introduce that as an amendment to the conditions? <br />KUBOTA:Are you asking for a motion? <br />GALDONES:Yes. <br />FUKE:Mr. Chair, if I can just kind of -. If IÓm hearing what youÓre saying <br />correctly, and I might not be hearing it correctly, would it be something along this line, <br />that in the event that DLNR requires a data recovery plan and its implementation be <br />required for the habitation site, the other remaining site on the property, it shall be done <br />prior to issuance of any land disturbance permit -. <br />KUBOTA:Perfect. It sounds great. <br />FUKE:Something along that line? <br />KUBOTA:Yeah. <br />FUKE:So that would mean that if DLNR doesnÓt require it, then it doesnÓt <br />become a requirement. <br />KUBOTA:Fine. That suits me fine. Thank you. <br />FUKE:Okay. <br />GALDONES:Okay. IÓd like to call on Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN:Yes. I would request an amendment, a complete change to No <br />again, paragraph 3, my apologies. And the reason is that, as written, paragraph 3 is a <br />little confusing as to, because it starts off as what happens if the Kuakini Highway <br />improvement is not completed; and then the second sentence is meant to apply whether or <br />not the Kuakini Highway improvement is completed. But itÓs not <br />is written. Just, for a little bit, and I know it is late, for a little bit of background, the <br />Sarona Road/ Kuakini Highway intersection has to be improved before this hotel can be <br />opened. WeÓre not responsible to permit that. The County, fort <br />landowner, the County has the project on the books and is planning to do it. But <br />sometimes things donÓt go as planned. So the wording, the first sentence of paragraph 3, <br />would not be -. ÐIf the Kuakini Highway/Sarona Road intersection improvements, <br />planned by the County, are not completed prior to occupancy of the hotel, the Applicant <br />shall construct the Kuakini Highway/Sarona Road intersection improvements in the <br />manner shown in the Department of Public WorkÓs plans for the intersection.Ñ ThatÓs the <br />first sentence. <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.