My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-01-03 THUALALAI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-01-03 THUALALAI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:03:49 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:03:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
government roads, including roads in old territorial homesteads. ItÓs my understanding <br />that the Kohanaiki Road is a government road. Over the years the County and State have <br />disputed the responsibility for the roads in limbo. ItÓs my belief that the roads in limbo <br />that, unfortunately, that the way the laws work is that they are County responsibility. The <br />County is developing a program to try to take care of these roads. ItÓs a major, major <br />responsibility because there are hundreds of miles of these roads and most of them are <br />extremely substandard and donÓt even have an adequate right-of-way to be improved. So <br />thatÓs a major problem. But, you know, this is a long answer to <br />the Commission talked about or heard about roads in limbo a lot, I thought it was a <br />decent time to talk about this and explain this. <br />GOODALE:Does that mean that they will remove the ÐEnd of County RoadÑ <br />sign on that road and begin to maintain that or is it going to continue to be the end of <br />County road? <br />YUEN:There are two issues here. One is, is the County, ultimately, is it <br />under the CountyÓs jurisdiction? And the answer to that is going to be yes. And the <br />second question, what is the County going to do about maintaining the roads? I canÓt say <br />that the result of this is going to be the County is going to maintain, actively maintain, <br />more roads than it currently does. As to whether the sign like that will be removed, I <br />canÓt really comment on that. <br />GOODALE:The sign denotes its ownership and youÓre saying that you do, at <br />this point, claim ownership but not responsibility for maintaining? Is that what youÓre <br />saying? <br />YUEN:These roads are under, itÓs my view that these roads are under <br />County jurisdiction. Whether, that does not mean that the County has to actively <br />maintain all roads that are under its jurisdiction. These include outright paper roads. <br />GOODALE:Okay, so that sign you would say would be incorrect to be there <br />because it disclaims ownership of that road, or -? <br />YUEN:And I havenÓt studied the area specifically. But if this road is, as I <br />think it is, a homestead road, a government road, then the road would be under County <br />jurisdiction. <br />GOODALE:Okay. Thank you. The road that exists there, to continue on, I <br />wanted to clarify that, first, the road as it exists there is a very narrow road, itÓs a one-lane <br />road. ItÓs a road that we commonly have to back up when we pass another car, and there <br />are pull-outs on this road. There are steep grades in some areas on both sides of the road <br />and there is a fairly high density in a certain, in certain areas of that road of, say, 15,000 <br />square foot lots. In different sections, it does not lend itself to a through way. We did <br />have a significant problem a while back before Kona Hills put the rock wall across the <br />roadway with motorcycles and cars transiting that, and that has since ceased. WeÓre <br />pleased with that and weÓd like it to remain that way; and weÓd like to prevent that from <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.