2006-08-04 TNST - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HAMAKAWA:That’s to show the part ownership. ALAMEDA:Okay, okay, I appreciate that. Any other questions for our testifier? Okay, Commissioner Iwashita. IWASHITA:Thank you. Ms. Hamakawa, in your comments you say that Commercial- Neighborhood or RCX Residential Commercial zoning that that would be acceptable? HAMAKAWA:I beg your pardon? IWASHITA:That that would be acceptable, that those two would be acceptable to you? HAMAKAWA:Yes, yes, we feel that that should be better than the MCX-20. Because the MCX-20 I understand they can build whatever they want build, and it would not revert back to Residential, is what we’re concerned about. IWASHITA:Okay. So I take it you’ve looked at the Zoning Code and looked at the list of things that can be done. So the list of things that can be done in -. HAMAKAWA:It’s very scary. IWASHITA:In CN or RCX, those are acceptable; but those in MCX that you don’t want all of those uses if possible? HAMAKAWA:Yes. IWASHITA:Thank you. HAMAKAWA:We would rather have that than -. ALAMEDA:Thank you, Commissioner Iwashita for that clarification. Any other questions for Ms. Hamakawa before we let her go back to sit down? Thank you so much for coming, Mrs. Hamakawa. HAMAKAWA:Well, thank you very much for listening to me. ALAMEDA:No problem. You may be seated. Could we invite the applicant’s representative back up at this time, Mr. Torigoe? Or can we engage in discussion first and then invite the applicant back up? TORIGOE:Well, normally you allow the applicant to come up and respond to whatever testimony was given by the public, right? ALAMEDA:Yeah, could you please step forward again. I wanted to give you a chance to respond to our testifier before we start going into a discussion and having questions at all. You’ve heard Mrs. Hamakawa. Do you have any feedback, comments for us, or reactions? 6EXHIBIT C