My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-04 TKitagawa
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-08-04 TKitagawa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:13:09 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:13:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA:Yes. <br />HAYASHI:Chair? <br />ALAMEDA:Aye. <br />HAYASHI:Motion carries. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. All right. We have a second application for Contested Case. <br />Can I call on Roderick and Gloria Hickman. Could you please come forward. I have to swear <br />you in at this time. Could you please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the <br />truth now before the Hawai`i County Planning Commission? <br />TESTIFIERS:Yes. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Could you please state your name and address for the record? <br />HICKMAN:Roderick Hickman, 541 Ocean View Drive, Hilo, Hawai`i. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Ma’am? Gloria, could you please state your address? <br />HICKMAN:Gloria Colden Hickman, 541 Ocean View Drive. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. That’s just for the record. I don’t know if I got you, Sidney, to <br />state your name and address for the record, now that I’m thinking. Could you please do that. <br />FUKE:I did state my name. My business address is 100 Pauahi Street, Hilo, <br />Hawai`i. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Thank you. Mr. and Mrs. Hickman, do you have any additional <br />comments to add to the discussion or share anything from your end? Go ahead. <br />R. HICKMAN: We had the opportunity to talk to the Petitioner and spend some time <br />getting further clarity. Our original contestant was based on more or less a lack of clear <br />understanding on what the, one, process was going to be and, two, what the intent of the <br />Petitioner was for that particular area that was adjoining Ocean View Drive, which is right out of <br />our front door. After discussing that with them, I think we’ve been provided with additional <br />information to allow us to at least digest what the scope of the project is going to be and to be <br />able to probably stipulate with them some satisfaction. <br />The other thing, though, is I think that there needs to, from our perspective, we need to be able to <br />clearly understand from a process standpoint, as I go forward if the project is approved, on what <br />they’re going to do at what stage and in the process to insure that we still have some appropriate <br />visability so we’re not looking at a parking lot. That’s probably the most succinct way for me to <br />describe it. I don’t want to look out the front door at a parking lot. If they do something that <br />disallows me to look out the front door at a parking lot and we don’t have access or egress <br />problems in regards to Ocean View, we probably can be pretty comfortable with the process as it <br />is. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.