My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-04 TKitagawa
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-08-04 TKitagawa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:13:09 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:13:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Kalanianole Avenue has a current right-of-way width of 70 feet with an approximately 22-foot <br />wide pavement; and Kumau Street currently is County-owned and has a right-of-way width of 70 <br />feet with approximately a 20-foot wide pavement. <br />I just received an e-mail, unfortunately I was not able to circulate that to you, from Galen Kuba <br />from the Department of Public Works indicating that the County and the State are in the process <br />of turning over this section of Kumau Street from the County to the State. So that process is <br />currently ongoing. <br />The proposed facility will be hooked up to the County sewer line. <br />We did receive Petitions for Standing in a Contested Case from two individuals. They both live <br />or have leases in these lots along Ocean View Drive. The first Petition, which was filed timely, <br />was submitted by Roderick and Gloria Hickman, and they live at 541 Ocean View Drive. And <br />541 Ocean View Drive would be generally in this location, almost in back of the subject <br />property. <br />The other application which was filed, an untimely filing, was submitted by I. C. Haunani Henry <br />and they have a lease on 504 Ocean View Drive; and that would be more towards the southwest <br />of the subject property. And Haunani Henry will be represented by, I guess her son, Leonard <br />Bolinger. I’m not sure as to whether Mr. Bolinger is here today. <br />The Planning Director is recommending approval of the subject request, with proposed <br />conditions. We also received some material from the Applicant’s representative this morning. <br />I’ll defer to the Applicant’s representative to explain those exhibits or information that they had <br />submitted. Are there any questions? <br />ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners, are there any questions? Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Yeah, Norman, as far the SMA Permit, now this previously was a car <br />dealership. Is the reason for the SMA Permit because of the renovations and paving of new <br />area? If things weren’t changed, would an SMA Permit be required is my question, I guess. If <br />there were no repaving, no renovation of the building, would the SMA Permit be required or -? <br />HAYASHI:No. <br />MCCALL:No. So it’s only because of the -? <br />HAYASHI:It’s only because they’re doing the renovation to the buildings, as well as <br />the parking areas. <br />MCCALL:Okay. Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Chair. Norman, you mentioned that there are some <br />residential, residents in the back of the subject property and they are leased from <br />the State. Would you know the terms of the lease from the State and are they zoned MG? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.