My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-04 TMCNICOLL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-08-04 TMCNICOLL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:13:16 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:13:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Okay. Who would like to take a stab in making a motion that captures <br />perhaps what the Commissioners are feeling at this time? Or maybe we need to discuss further? <br />Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I’ll take a shot at this. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />WATANABE:I move that we approve the Special Permit application, <br />SPP 06-000030, subject to landscape screening, sight distance improvements along Ainaola <br />Driveway per Public Works approval, however, with a one-year limitation and, also, an <br />additional one-year administrative extension. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, a motion was made by Commissioner Watanabe. Is there a second? <br />MCCALL:Clarification? <br />ALAMEDA:Clarification for the motion, Mr. McCall? <br />MCCALL:So you’re basically saying you’re giving them a permit, but just for one <br />year with a one-year extension and then he needs to be out? <br />WATANABE:Yeah, for clarification, actually with the Miranda one, to be honest with <br />you, I don’t know if you guys recall but I was kind of against it. What we did do is we limited <br />the number of trucks, we limited the area and we also limited the time. In that particular one, I <br />thought maybe a five-year period was more appropriate because, like you had mentioned, there <br />wasn’t very much available properly-zoned land. In this case, I think there are available <br />substitutes; and I think there’s enough concern that, you know, a one-year limit -. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />MCCALL:I’d second that. I feel that a one-year timeframe is reasonable and, you <br />know -. <br />WATANABE:But it also allows the administration to -. <br />MCCALL:Yeah, a second year, in case. But I think that’s reasonable. It would, you <br />know, in any circumstances it would take, you know, six months to a year to get something like <br />this cleaned up anyway. I think that’s reasonable. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, let me check. Motion made by Commissioner Watanabe, seconded <br />by Commissioner McCall. Is there any friendly amendment? Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:I have a question, then I would like to introduce a friendly amendment, if <br />it’s in order? <br />ALAMEDA:Go ahead, Commissioner Galdones. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.