2023-06-02 DRAFT Joint Meeting Exh B (Proposed Amendments to PC Rules 8 & 9)

Home

BALOG: Thank you, that answered my question. CAMERO: And to just go back to the April meeting. I think Maija had stated that we rarely see these instances happened within the Planning Department. KERN: Yes, if I may add. This isn't new. This been in place for, how long Maija? Decades? JACKSON: Many years. KERN: Many, many, many years. LIN: Just for my clarification. The rules and the amendments proposed today and at the last meeting. Is just to comply with what has changed, right, the Act 16 and HRS that's been passed over the few years. So, we're just trying to move into conformity. JACKSON: Yeah, I would say the first two items that Tracie mentioned in her presentation were directly from Act 16 or as a result of Act 16. The third one was somewhat at the request of SHPD because their application submittal requirements have changed over the last 5 to 10 years and our rules and application are outdated based on the feedback, we got from SHPD of how they want to receive the applications. So, that last slide was to address SHPD's concerns. CAMERO: And if I may add to that. We did take into account HAR, the rules for SHPD into that specific section for the archaeological resources. We combined it with our previous wording within the rule. LIN: Thank you. Any other questions? Leeward Commissioners any questions? Okay, it not then I will entertain a motion on the proposed rules. DANIELE: I'll put in a motion to adopt these rules. Adopt the amendments, excuse me. LIN: It's been moved by Commissioner Daniel. DE LUZ: Second. LIN: Seconded by Commissioner De Luz. Any discussion on this motion? Seeing none, a roll call vote. CAMERO: Thank you. Commissioner Balog? BALOG: Aye. CAMERO: Commissioner Cross? 8 EXHIBIT B (DRAFT)