2005-08-05 TDELOZIER - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

zoning, we would have a fair share assessment for 14 units minus the one thats allowed under the current zoning. SIRACUSA:Okay. So its not that this Condition Gis not applicable; it is even with the proposed change of zone. YUEN:It is applicable. If its developed as a commercial building there wont be any fair share assessment because there isnt, the practice has not been. If the system though is changed to an impact fee system that does assess on a commercial building, then there would be an impact fee assessment, if that happened before a building permit were issued for this property, for example. So we still need to have that fair share impact fee condition in there. And the RS-10 zoning is simply to refer to the fact that if he did it as a residential project one unit would be exempted from the fair share. SIRACUSA:Thank you. I had another issue about Condition E which refers to the,letssee,theapplicantshallinstallstreetlightsandtrafficcontrolsasrequiredbythe Traffic Division, DPW, applicant shall be responsible for design, purchase, installation of such devices, etc., etc. And it was my impression that that intersection there has just recently been redone; and so Im wondering why that would be in there. YUEN:Well, traffic controls, the intersection was redone. The street lights, the traffic controls could be something as simple as a sign for the building itself. SIRACUSA:Oh, like a hidden entrance sign or something like that? YUEN:Something like that, or striping for the turn. Im not sure exactly what would be required here; but it is a standard condition. SIRACUSA:Okay. Then I have three suggestions I would like to see as added conditions. And one would be to incorporate Mr. Deloziers agreement to install a gate or a chain or something like that that would close off the parking lot after hours. And another would be his agreement not to develop a second business within that building, because that would keep the traffic down also not having a second business. I dont like the idea of approving a pig-in-the-poke, as Ive said before. And the third one, I dont remember that right of the top of my head now. But at least those two I would like to see incorporated. Oh, the third one had to do with my question, what I was going to ask you at the very beginning, if there was some way that we could protect that historical building from being torn down in the future, as long as its still a viable building that is, even if we changed the zone. Is there some process or some way we could word a condition that would protect that structure? YUEN:Is your purpose in protecting the building to, because of the historic significance of the building itself or because of the scale of the, the ultimate scale of the project that can be developed if its limited to something like the existing building? 29EXHIBIT A