Laserfiche WebLink
WATANABE: Thank you. Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: I’d like to make a couple of comments. First of all, I think you’ve done an <br />extraordinary job, and I’d like to commend all of the citizens of Kohala that participated, and <br />particularly Allen Salavea – I think he did an excellent job here.Participation in this community <br />has been without equal. We’ve looked through now -, we’ve actually had hearings on two <br />Community Development Plans and South Kohala is coming up. Public participation in the <br />Puna District was between 4 and 5 percent, Kona was just over 3 percent, and South Kohala was <br />9 percent. And I don’t know where Allen came up with 12 percent, but by the figures I’d used to <br />give you the other numbers, I had 18 percent for you; 1,091 participated out of 6,000 and change, <br />that’s 18 percent. That’s extraordinary. So that is really exceptional. <br />And I would comment on two other things before I get into the other things. One is I think the <br />CDP was very focused; you started out setting your goals – you want open spaces, you want a <br />rural community, small town feel, maintain cultural heritage and maintain an agricultural base – <br />and that’s carried out through the document from beginning to end. So it makes it easy reading <br />and it all ties it together. So again I think that is a tribute to the consultant and to Allen for doing <br />a great job there. It’s also concise. This thing is just a little over 100 pages. The last one we <br />looked at, the Kona Community Development Plan, Volume I was 278 pages with a 551-page of <br />appendix – when they had a little over 3-percent participation. So I think all in all you’ve done a <br />great job. <br />Now, I have a couple of questions. I agree with 99 percent of what’s in here, but there are a few <br />things – as they say the devils in the details – there are a few devilish details in this Plan. One, <br />on Page 23, No. 7, it says, “County permits and approvals for North Kohala, including but not <br />limited to zoning changes, subdivision approvals, and building permits, shall have expiration <br />dates, and these expiration dates shall be adhered to.” How can you have an expiration on a <br />zoning? Now, every time there is a zoning change, there is a certain period of time whereby the <br />party has to live up to certain conditions; but once they live up to those conditions, it is zoned <br />that way. And then to change it, it has to be rezoned. So – and I would like Mr. Torigoe’s <br />opinion on this, too – I don’t think this is going to stick, to be honest with you. <br />There was another -, it says in the CDP that if there is a conflict between the CDP and the <br />General Plan, that there will be a conference set up. Okay, but I’ll tell you what: If there is no <br />amendment to the General Plan, the General Plan takes precedence – that’s spelled out in Section <br />15 of the General Plan. <br />But I’d like Mr. Torigoe’s opinion on this first question about zoning changes having expiration <br />dates. <br />TORIGOE: Mr. Chairman. <br />WATANABE: Sure, Mr. Torigoe. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />7 <br /> <br />