2010-08-12 THU HONUA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

me, sir? DOMINGO: Yes. QNGQ9Hllrnqqx,- DOMINGO: Yes. QNGQ9Lq-Cnlhmfn+xntlqd`kk`mdvBnllhrrhnm+Ok`mmhmfBnllhrrhnm+rhmbdHludaddm hmunkudcvhsggd`qhmfr+rnHllrnqqx-Hlckhjdsn`mrvdqlxudqrion, my version of an answer to your question. We can all ddbhcdsg`sxntlqdmnscdbhchmfsg`s+sg`sxntlqdcdbhchmfsnfn forward. And if Hu honua wants -. I think the rule states that you can let it be litigated to settle the issue. But I would like to just come to terms with Hu Honua and get to the bottom of sghrrnsg`svdcnmlsv`rsddudqxnmdlrshld-RnHllsqxhmfsnsdkksgdlvg`ssgdxchcvqnmf- So please bear with me. Your Rule 9-11(g) states only the applicant can apply to the Com And your Rule 2-1 defines an applicant as somebody who applies for a permit. Hu Honua is not the applicant. Hilo Coast Processing Company applied for the permit 25 years ago. Your rule state, 9-11(b), the applicant shall submhssgdenkknvhmfsnsgdChqdbsnq9o- Oh, first of all, your rules also state in the matter of the applicant, in the meaning of the applicant, no-where does it state landowner, assignees, successor means applicant, no-where. And your rules require you to use plain language. The common understood usage of words like applicant, a person who applier-Hslr`m`artqc+hslr`m`artqcbnmbktsion to think that a new person with land rights or some kind of rights who uses a property 25 years after the fact can amend a permit for another applicant who is now nonexistent, and especially one of this magnitude and where the landowner has sold 1,000 acres and it has been subdivided into lots and people have bought tgnrd`mcsgdxlqdkhuhmfsgdqdmnv-@nd now you want to turn back on the power plant? Things have changed. And there are two soil excavation businesses, there are people living ax+sgdqd`qdlnmjrd`krrvhllhmfax-Sgdqdlrmnv`rstcxsg`sr sg`slrsgdhql`hmeddchmffqntnd. And that area, of all the major Hawaiian islands the Hmkua coast is the major feeding grounds for the Hawksbill turtles that occupy the main Hawaiian Islands. There are things th`sg`udbg`mfdc:`mcrnhslrmnsitrs+ng+kdslrkdt it slide. SgdGhrsnqhbOqdrdqu`shnmOqnbdctqdr+Hllfk`c what I did because I stopped them from destroying historic properties without surveying them first. I was appalled when I realized that what the historic, what do they call it, an archaeologic, some kind of review of literature. When I read that it was so wrong, I immediately wrote to the Preservation, the State Historic Preservation Division. And I got to the bottom of it. What happened v`rGtGnmt`lrOBRH+ their archaeologist sent in a draft review of literature in January,`mchsr`hcnCq`es-o@mcsgdx chcmlso`x`edd-@mcsgdknb`kagent called them up and said, well+sghrhrmlsxdsdmntfg+sgdqd 8 EXHIBITC