My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-08-22 TSTANFORDCARR
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-08-22 TSTANFORDCARR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:25:44 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:25:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Association and the Villages at Mauna Lani AOAO withdrew their petitions in June 2008, a <br />couple of days before the contested case hearing was to commence by the hearings officer. And <br />both of these associations reached negotiated resolutions of their issues with the applicant, and <br />now express their support for the application. <br />Planning Department has submitted to you supplemental information; and the supplemental <br />information is the green-color paper. We’ve also submitted revised background and <br />recommendation. And basically the revised background and recommendation included a new <br />Exhibit 15, which is the report prepared by the University of Hawaii, called “A Review of <br />Coastal Monitoring Data for Developments in West Hawaii,” and this was as a result of a request <br />by a former Planning Commissioner, William Graham, who indicated that he wanted to have this <br />report entered into the record, so we have presented that as an exhibit. And we also included a <br />new condition, No. 10, which basically refers to a water quality monitoring program. And all of <br />you have a copy of those revised background and recommendation noted in the yellow handout <br />that was sent to you. <br />So rather than going through the details of the project, I’d like to defer that to the applicant, and <br />they are prepared to give that presentation to you. Are there any questions regarding the <br />procedures that I’ve outlined? <br />WATANABE: Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman, thank you. What does this mean where it says 184 rooms, <br />266 keys? I’m not sure what “keys” mean? What is that? <br />HAYASHI: Okay. I can explain that to you, but I think the applicant is prepared to <br />respond to that question. <br />WATANABE: Shall we, is it okay if we defer it to the applicant, Mr. Woodward? <br />WOODWARD: Sure, fine with me. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Any further questions of the staff? Okay. Thank you, Mr. <br />Hayashi. So Mr. Lim? <br />LIM: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission. Steven Lim <br />representing Stanford Carr Development, LLC. With us today is Stanford Carr, the principal <br />who is seated in the middle. To his right is, from Wilson Okamoto, Alan Suwa, our project <br />planner. And Tiffany Mathias also with Wilson Okamoto, in the purple. To Stanford’s left is <br />Ernie Vasquez from MVE Architects, our project architect. Also with us today are Jennifer <br />Benck from Carlsmith Ball, Peter Phillips from SCD and Tom Nance from Tom Nance Water <br />Engineering. <br />We are going to take the liberty to make the project presentation. Alan will lead off with the <br />presentation, and Ernie Vasquez will detail the project concepts for you. We’ll discuss the <br />question raised by Commissioner Woodward. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.