My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-25 T-AHUI HOU
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-08-25 T-AHUI HOU
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:29:24 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:29:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:I noticed that, I believe this equipment is going to cost about $75,000. Is <br />that correct? <br />P. BRUMGAUGH:Yes, it is. <br />SIRACUSA:And Mr. Salavea had made a recommendation during the hearing about a <br />conditional permit which would sort of test the waters and allow you to proceed as long as <br />everything was 100 percent pollution and smoke free. And, yet, I’m wondering how that strikes <br />you if you go ahead and spend that money and install it and then it turns out that it’s not as which <br />was represented to you by the company, that there is odor, there is smoke and there is perhaps an <br />unacceptable amount of particulates. What would you consider as viable options for you if there <br />were a conditional permit and this happened? <br />CARROLL:Well, number one, we do accept the conditional permit and that will pass <br />on to the manufacturers; and from what we know about the product they produce world-wide, <br />we’re not worried about that. And if we do have to worry about it, it’ll come out a lot more than <br />$70,000 against that corporation. But we’re absolutely prepared to accept a conditional permit <br />with the conditions that would require a proper operation that is smoke free and odor free. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa, follow-up? <br />SIRACUSA:Not right now. <br />ALAMEDA:All right. Other Commissioners? Mr. Darrow? <br />DARROW:Thank you. Just for clarification, there was a question earlier about the, <br />whether or not the Applicants have received the Approval Recommendation. That has been <br />withheld; and, again, that’s, if the Commissioners choose to go in that direction, we can go ahead <br />and pass that out. Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. All right. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:No, thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Mr. Darrow, are you saying that we could have that for our review? <br />Do you have nine copies? <br />DARROW:More than nine. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Fellow Commissioners, we are now looking at the <br />Recommendations by the Department. It’s the positive Recommendation as opposed to the one <br />in our packet which was a negative Recommendation. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I have a question for the Applicant. In this back, referring to the <br />conditional use permit, yeah, because this is such a huge investment, and I’m not saying that you <br />wouldn’t be able to comply. But in the event that you were not able to comply, are you then still <br />EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.