My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-25 TJR
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-08-25 TJR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:29:27 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:29:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:That’s it. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, any other questions for Norman? All right. Seeing none, will the <br />Applicant or the representative, please come forward? Please raise your right hand? Do you <br />swear or affirm to tell the truth now before the Hawai`i County Planning Commission? <br />TESTIFIERS:I do. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Starting from my far left, could you please state your name <br />and address for the record? <br />SUEDA:Lloyd Sueda, 905 Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawai`i. <br />COUSIN:I’m Jerry Cousin, 75-6009 Alii Drive, Kailua-Kona. <br />ALAMEDA:Thanks, Jerry. Thank you. You guys got the Department’s <br />recommendation with conditions and you’ve heard some of our discussion. You have any <br />comments, or questions, or things that need clarifying? <br />SUEDA:In talking to Jerry with all of the proposals by the Planning Department, I <br />think we will abide by all of these conditions, except, not except for, but I wanted to speak about <br />No. 3, which requires a consolidation of Parcel 86 and 87, you know, although we’re basically in <br />87, 88. And as I told, I think we talked about it at one time, Norman, what we did was 86 and <br />87, as it is today or prior to today, had a different subdivision line, that with this increase in <br />square footage some of the building would encroach over the property line. So what we did, and <br />it has been completed already, is that we did a consolidation and a resubdivision. So if you look <br />at the line, we resubdivided 86 and 87 so there would be no encroachment over a property line. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Norman? <br />HAYASHI:Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I just to clarify and point out that this is the <br />line that divides Parcel 86 from Parcel 87. Yes, the Applicant has submitted a <br />consolidation/resubdivision application to create the line as such, to move the line from here to <br />this blue line. So this side of the blue line would be Parcel 86. However, that application is still <br />pending with the Planning Department. That is why we decided to include that particular <br />condition. So the consolidation/resubdivision has not been finalized. <br />ALAMEDA:Do you have any comment to that, sir? <br />SUEDA:That’s correct. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Go ahead. <br />COUSIN:The reason that the property we would like to stay subdivided is really at <br />the wish of our landlord, Lanihau Properties. And at the termination of our lease, they would <br />like to have the ability to rent the parcel, if need be, to different people because of the size of the <br />different parcels. There’s no guarantee that they could rent or lease out a parcel that large to any <br />one renter and have to reapply for a subdivision in the future.So they would prefer to leave <br />EXHIBIT C <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.