My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-25 TJR
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-08-25 TJR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:29:27 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:29:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a problem, for example, you know, you have all these paved surfaces that are used by cars, and if <br />runoff from these onto the ground is not sufficiently cleaned by going through lava rock before it <br />gets to groundwater or goes out to the sea, then we have a problem that is of a, you know, <br />magnitude of thousands of times greater than any of the individual applications that we have <br />before us. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham, I want to give you an opportunity to respond. <br />GRAHAM:Yeah. And so, you know, I don’t want to put your application -. Maybe <br />the only thing I can really do is when it comes time to make motions, I can make a motion that <br />we continue it for a period till you guys can research it more. But since I’m doing this as a <br />question to you, do you have any insight as to anything that you might, could do between now <br />and the next meeting that would help bring more specificity other than what the Planning <br />Director is saying towards a belief on my and our part that there will not be a problem on water <br />going towards the ocean through the drywells? <br />SUEDA:Well, I think the normal direction that we would do is that, assuming we <br />get an approval on the SMA and assuming we’ll go in for a permit, Public Works at that time <br />that’s their job and their responsibility to resolve this issue. Isn’t that it, Chris? At that time if <br />they decide, whatever the reason may be for right next to the ocean, decide to put a filter in, <br />that’s their decision. I don’t think it’s the Applicant’s decision at this time. I think we’re just <br />trying to get an SMA approval at this time; and I think all the detailed things will get resolved <br />during the permit process. <br />COUSIN:If I can add, the one thing that I can, rest assured from my perspective as a <br />General Manager and speaking for our owner is it’s bad business for us not to be a good <br />community citizen. So we would not want to do anything that would give us bad press because <br />it’s bad business. And we’re about to invest $2-1/2 to $3 million in a facility; and it would all go <br />to waste if on the front page of West Hawai`i Today somebody said that, you know, we were <br />having all kinds of bad runoff into the ocean or creating environmental problems. So it’s in our <br />best interest as a business, not just to comply with the law for legality’s sake or to comply with <br />policies of the Public Works for that, but for the purpose of good business and to be a good <br />community citizen. So although I’m not a technical adviser on this, and I depend on Lloyd for <br />that from the prospect of business, there’s nothing that we wouldn’t do to make sure that this was <br />right and met all County standards. If we couldn’t do that then we just wouldn’t do the project. <br />It’s that simple for us. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. I know that there’s some kind of material that’s used when there are <br />oil slicks on the ocean that are sort of like a foam that they spray on the surface and all the oil <br />sticks to it. I don’t know if that’s ever used in drywells, in situations like this to keep the oil <br />separated from the rest of the water that’s going out. But I noticed on Condition No. 6, it says, <br />“All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward <br />any adjacent properties,” but it does not say, “shall not be directed towards the ocean.” <br />YUEN:Well, that’s the on-site, that’s the on-site part. And then it can’t get to the <br />ocean without going through an adjacent property because the property, this property is not on <br />EXHIBIT C <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.