Laserfiche WebLink
proposed Kahului to Keauhou Parkway, also referred to as Alii Parkway. Alii Drive is located <br />here going towards Keauhou, and this would be in the Kailua direction. <br />The Applicant is requesting an SMA Use Permit to allow the construction of 15 two-story <br />structures, generally laid out in this configuration. Access would be from Alii Drive. Currently, <br />no access is proposed from the Kahului to Keauhou Parkway. <br />Since the last meeting, we had received three letters from the general public. One was from <br />Verneta and Robert Milton; also, a Janet Topor-Bixler, as well as Mitzi Shepard, and all of you <br />had received copies of these correspondences. <br />th <br />On July 28, we received a letter from Mr. Sidney Fuke enclosing a letter dated July 26, 2006 <br />from Allen Hahn, who is the archaeologist for this project, with enclosures and, basically, <br />addressing the Cultural Resource Management Plan issue. In his letter, and I’ll refer to Page 2 of <br />Mr. Hahn’s letter, the second to the last paragraph; and I’d like to read that, “It is my considered <br />opinion that the Archaeological Inventory Survey, Burial Treatment Plan, and Site Preservation <br />Plan approved, provide the needed management program for the historic properties within the <br />subject parcels.” Based on Mr. Hahn’s professional opinion, the Planning Director has agreed <br />with the archaeologist that the document submitted does not conform to the requirements of the <br />zoning ordinance. <br />At this time, the Planning Director is again recommending approval. And we had submitted to <br />you a proposed amendment; and, basically, the proposed amendment will give the Applicant the <br />flexibility of providing a mixture of not only condominium but also to allow a mixture of Single <br />Family Residential and Duplex uses, provided that the density doesn’t exceed what was <br />originally proposed. And that amendment would be in the Background Report, excuse me, <br />Recommendation, Page 5, and I’ll read that into the record, “It should be noted the applicant may <br />reduce the density and product mix (i.e., allow for a mix of multiple-family residential units and <br />single-family residential units of the project, provided that the development generally conforms <br />to the proposed site plan.” <br />And as a result of that, we are recommending a new condition, No. 3, that states, and that is on <br />Page 7, that the applicant may reduce the density and product mixture, similar wording that I just <br />read to you. <br />And Condition 4, there’s no time condition recommended in the first draft recommendation. So <br />we included a new Condition 4 basically stating that the construction of the proposed <br />development shall be completed within five years from the approval of this permit. Are there <br />any questions at this time? <br />ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners? Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:Yeah. Norman, it seems also within that attachment that the State <br />Department of Land and Natural Resources has signed off on the Historic Preservation Review <br />Process and that the only other step remaining would be for them to approve, sign-off on their <br />Preservation Plan? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />2 <br /> <br />