2010-08-27 TFOULK - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I raise this not because we felt that it was absolutely necessary to do those things but because it’s now been raised, and we do want to make sure that we do answer whatever questions or concerns that have been raised, and try to address them as best as we can, and then bring that information to this body and allow it to, you know, digest that, and if there are conditions that are appropriate, adjust those as necessary. We did feel, though, however, that from the standpoint of this property already been developed, or there is also a set of principles that, you know, Angel Pilago had mentioned those, but part of the recognition even in the past case and the following case, Ka Pa‘akai, was that when you deal with already developed property, there is a certain balance between certain cultural rights and the owner’s -. OLSON: Respectfully, Mr. Chairman, I would like to object to this. I don’t know where Mr. Yeh is going in regard -. I think this is his argument. I think we are just trying to have housekeeping matters here. We’ve agreed to stipulate to continue this hearing, I believe, they can correct me if I’m wrong, provided that our witness, Junior Kanuha, would be allowed to testify. And if we want to set a date, which he is trying to get to about how long it’s going to take, we are amenable to that and we are agreeable to that, and that’s this inventory and this assessment, was what we asked from the first place. And so I think we can cut to the chase and set those dates, and then we can proceed with this hearing. YEH: Yeah, I was only, and I apologize -. HOUSEL: Okay. I’ll sustain that objection. YEH: Thank you, Mr. Chair. HOUSEL: Mr. Yeh, could I ask you a question? YEH: Certainly. HOUSEL: If there is a, you know, delay, with the additional assessment, you understand you would waive any time limits to conclude this hearing? YEH: Yes, I think that’s certainly fair. HOUSEL: Okay. What time frame would you expect that this would take? YEH: Well, if, one of the, we basically have two alternatives that I see is, one is to allow the applicant to get the feedback from SHPD and then notify staff and indicate that we are now ready to go, reschedule this; at the same time, you know, if we’re going to set some outside date, that at least maybe we come back with a status report or something – I would say about a four- month period would probably be the most appropriate. And the reason I say that is because it would then put some limits on SHPD to be able to timely respond to what’s been submitted. So that’s another suggestion. HOUSEL: Okay. I’d like to ask each of the parties if you could respond to that. 26 EXHIBIT C